↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET607^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.24s
% Output   : Refutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  180 (  54 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  211 (  27   ~;  53   |;  18   &; 113   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (  22   ^;   8   !;   4   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      = ( ^ [X2: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 )
              & ( X1 @ X2 ) )
            | ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_79_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 )
                & ( X1 @ X2 ) )
              | ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              | ( X0 @ X2 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ( X0 @ X3 ) )
              | ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              | ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
            | ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
            | ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
            | ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
            | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
          | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
          | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
          | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK2 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
          | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            | ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        & ~ ( sK0 @ sK2 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) )
    | ( $false = $true ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f31,f23]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1 @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false = $true ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f20,f35]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f37,f23]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f38]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET607^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:39:19 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862967)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=4023671270:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2862967-2862980"...
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)...printing done.
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862980)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.07/0.24  % (2862967)Success in time 0.015 s
% 0.07/0.24  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------