%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SET609+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:01:17 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 82.24s 13.74s % Output : CNFRefutation 82.24s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET609+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 08:54:26 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y % 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.13/0.38 # % 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 21 Number of unprocessed: 19 % 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.20/0.42 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.20/0.42 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.20/0.42 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.20/0.42 # 19 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.20/0.42 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.20/0.42 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.20/0.42 # Found 4 unit axioms. % 0.20/0.42 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.20/0.42 # 15 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.20/0.42 # 4 unit axiom clauses % 0.20/0.42 % 0.20/0.42 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.20/0.42 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 3.63/3.83 # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 3.63/3.83 # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on % 82.24/13.74 # There were 29 total branch saturation attempts. % 82.24/13.74 # There were 4 of these attempts blocked. % 82.24/13.74 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 82.24/13.74 # There were 7 free duplicated saturations. % 82.24/13.74 # There were 11 total successful branch saturations. % 82.24/13.74 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 82.24/13.74 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 82.24/13.74 # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 82.24/13.74 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 82.24/13.74 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 82.24/13.74 # Begin clausification derivation % 82.24/13.74 % 82.24/13.74 # End clausification derivation % 82.24/13.74 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (subset(X1,X1))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (union(X1,X2)=union(X2,X1))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (intersection(X1,X2)=intersection(X2,X1))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))!=difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X2))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~member(X1,difference(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,intersection(X3,X2)))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,difference(X2,X3)))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X1=X2|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~subset(X3,X2)|~member(X1,X3))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (X1=X2|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (member(X1,difference(X2,X3))|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,X2))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,union(X2,X3)))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,X2))). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 82.24/13.74 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 82.24/13.74 # Begin printing tableau % 82.24/13.74 # Found 19 steps % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))!=difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))), inference(start_rule)). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))!=difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (~member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (~member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_63, ...])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_378040, plain, (member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),difference(difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_676567, plain, (member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),union(X9,difference(difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167773, plain, (member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),union(union(X9,difference(difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))),X10))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167788, plain, (member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),union(X11,union(union(X9,difference(difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))),X10)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167803, plain, (~member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),difference(X12,union(X11,union(union(X9,difference(difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))),X10))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_378042, plain, (~member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167829, plain, (union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))=difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167822, plain, (~member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),intersection(X8,difference(X12,union(X11,union(union(X9,difference(difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))),X10)))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1167822, ...])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167830, plain, (member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167914, plain, (~member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1167830])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167912, plain, (member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),intersection(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167929, plain, (member(esk2_2(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_378042])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1167930, plain, (~subset(intersection(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_1999155, plain, (~member(esk1_2(intersection(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 82.24/13.74 cnf(i_0_2136124, plain, (~member(esk1_2(intersection(union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0)),union(intersection(esk3_0,esk5_0),difference(esk3_0,esk4_0))),difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0))),difference(difference(esk3_0,difference(esk4_0,esk5_0)),X6))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_2136124, ...])). % 82.24/13.74 # End printing tableau % 82.24/13.74 # SZS output end % 82.24/13.74 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 82.24/13.76 # Child (29902) has found a proof. % 82.24/13.76 % 82.24/13.76 # Proof search is over... % 82.24/13.76 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------