↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET610+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:17:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 31.97s 5.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 31.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   60 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  130 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  109 (  39   ~;  53   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  155 (  16 sgn  35   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X2)
        | member(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( ~ member(X3,X2)
        & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X2,X1)
        & subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(prove_th83,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : difference(union(X1,X2),X2) = difference(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th83) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( member(X11,union(X9,X10))
        | ~ member(X11,X10) )
      & ( member(X11,union(X9,X10))
        | ~ member(X11,X9) )
      & ( member(X11,X10)
        | member(X11,X9)
        | ~ member(X11,union(X9,X10)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X24,X25,X26,X27,X28] :
      ( ( subset(X27,X28)
        | ~ member(esk5_2(X27,X28),X28) )
      & ( subset(X27,X28)
        | member(esk5_2(X27,X28),X27) )
      & ( member(X26,X25)
        | ~ member(X26,X24)
        | ~ subset(X24,X25) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( ~ member(X3,X2)
        & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3)
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( member(X8,difference(X6,X7))
        | member(X8,X7)
        | ~ member(X8,X6) )
      & ( ~ member(X8,difference(X6,X7))
        | ~ member(X8,X7) )
      & ( ~ member(X8,difference(X6,X7))
        | member(X8,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | subset(union(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),X1),X2)
    | subset(union(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3)
    | subset(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] : union(X12,X13) = union(X13,X12),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | subset(difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2)
    | subset(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X30,X31] :
      ( ( X30 = X31
        | ~ subset(X31,X30)
        | ~ subset(X30,X31) )
      & ( X30 != X31
        | subset(X31,X30) )
      & ( X30 != X31
        | subset(X30,X31) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(union(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X1),X2)
    | subset(union(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subset(X1,union(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(difference(union(X1,X2),X3),X4),X1)
    | member(esk5_2(difference(union(X1,X2),X3),X4),X2)
    | subset(difference(union(X1,X2),X3),X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(difference(X2,X3),X4)),X2)
    | member(esk5_2(X1,union(difference(X2,X3),X4)),X3)
    | subset(X1,union(difference(X2,X3),X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X1)),X2)
    | subset(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),X4)
    | subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),union(X1,X3)),X2)
    | subset(union(X1,X2),union(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    subset(union(X1,difference(X1,X2)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    subset(difference(X1,X2),union(X3,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | subset(difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(difference(union(X1,X2),X3),X1),X2)
    | subset(difference(union(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),union(difference(X2,X3),X1)),X3)
    | subset(union(X1,X2),union(difference(X2,X3),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    subset(union(X1,X2),union(X1,union(X3,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    union(X1,difference(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X4))
    | member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

fof(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : difference(union(X1,X2),X2) = difference(X1,X2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th83]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    subset(difference(union(X1,X2),X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    subset(union(X1,X2),union(X1,difference(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_40]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    subset(union(X1,difference(X2,X3)),union(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X2)
    | member(esk5_2(X1,difference(X2,X3)),X3)
    | subset(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),union(X4,X1))
    | subset(difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    difference(union(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0) != difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    subset(difference(union(X1,X2),X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    union(X1,difference(X2,X1)) = union(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( member(esk5_2(difference(X1,X2),difference(union(X3,X1),X4)),X4)
    | subset(difference(X1,X2),difference(union(X3,X1),X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    difference(union(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0) != difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    subset(difference(union(X1,X2),X1),difference(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    subset(difference(X1,X2),difference(union(X3,X1),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    difference(union(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk2_0) != difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    difference(union(X1,X2),X1) = difference(X2,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_55]),c_0_56])]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET610+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:29:41 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 31.97/5.85  % Version: 3.5.1
% 31.97/5.85  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 31.97/5.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % sh5l with pid 232238 completed with status 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Result found by sh5l
% 31.97/5.85  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 31.97/5.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 31.97/5.85  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 31.97/5.85  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 31.97/5.85  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % SubtermCWHack with pid 232245 completed with status 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 31.97/5.85  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 31.97/5.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 31.97/5.85  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 31.97/5.85  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 31.97/5.85  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 31.97/5.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 31.97/5.85  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 31.97/5.85  
% 31.97/5.85  % Proof found!
% 31.97/5.85  % SZS status Theorem
% 31.97/5.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 31.97/5.85  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 31.97/5.85  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Initial clauses                      : 21
% 31.97/5.85  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 31.97/5.85  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 31.97/5.85  % Processed clauses                    : 27853
% 31.97/5.85  % ...of these trivial                  : 1768
% 31.97/5.85  % ...subsumed                          : 24419
% 31.97/5.85  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1666
% 31.97/5.85  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 31.97/5.85  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 31.97/5.85  % Backward-rewritten                   : 105
% 31.97/5.85  % Generated clauses                    : 463864
% 31.97/5.85  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 351684
% 31.97/5.85  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 7
% 31.97/5.85  % Paramodulations                      : 462586
% 31.97/5.85  % Factorizations                       : 1276
% 31.97/5.85  % NegExts                              : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 31.97/5.85  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Total rewrite steps                  : 382668
% 31.97/5.85  % ...of those cached                   : 360719
% 31.97/5.85  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 31.97/5.85  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 31.97/5.85  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 31.97/5.85  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 31.97/5.85  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 31.97/5.85  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1542
% 31.97/5.85  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 516
% 31.97/5.85  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 25
% 31.97/5.85  %    Negative unit clauses             : 34
% 31.97/5.85  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 967
% 31.97/5.85  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 322789
% 31.97/5.85  % ...number of literals in the above   : 930970
% 31.97/5.85  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Current number of archived clauses   : 122
% 31.97/5.85  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 396540
% 31.97/5.85  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 158395
% 31.97/5.85  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11704
% 31.97/5.85  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 78826
% 31.97/5.85  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 1993
% 31.97/5.85  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 11610
% 31.97/5.85  % BW rewrite match successes           : 224
% 31.97/5.85  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 31.97/5.85  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7855802
% 31.97/5.85  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 348
% 31.97/5.85  
% 31.97/5.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 31.97/5.85  % User time                : 5.025 s
% 31.97/5.85  % System time              : 0.241 s
% 31.97/5.85  % Total time               : 5.266 s
% 31.97/5.85  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 31.97/5.85  
% 31.97/5.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 31.97/5.85  % User time                : 5.027 s
% 31.97/5.85  % System time              : 0.245 s
% 31.97/5.85  % Total time               : 5.272 s
% 31.97/5.85  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 31.97/5.85  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------