↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET611^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 9.90s 3.13s
% Output   : Refutation 8.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   30
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  258 (  49 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  427 ( 105   ~;  86   |;  40   &; 196   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (  33   ^;  29   !;   0   ?;  64   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: a > $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: a > $o ).

thf(sk5_decl,type,
    sk5: a ).

thf(sk6_decl,type,
    sk6: a ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: a > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: a > $o] :
              ( ( ( ^ [C: a] :
                      ( ( A @ C )
                      & ( B @ C ) ) )
                = ( ^ [C: a] : $false ) )
              = ( ( ^ [C: a] :
                      ( ( A @ C )
                      & ~ ( B @ C ) ) )
                = A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: a > $o] :
          ( ( ( ^ [B: a] :
                  ( ( sk1 @ B )
                  & ( A @ B ) ) )
            = ( ^ [B: a] : $false ) )
         != ( ( ^ [B: a] :
                  ( ( sk1 @ B )
                  & ~ ( A @ B ) ) )
            = sk1 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o] :
      ( ( ( ^ [C: a] :
              ( ( A @ C )
              & ( B @ C ) ) )
        = ( ^ [C: a] : $false ) )
      = ( ( ^ [C: a] :
              ( ( A @ C )
              & ~ ( B @ C ) ) )
        = A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_84_pme) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ^ [C: a] :
                ( ( A @ C )
                & ( B @ C ) ) )
          = ( ^ [C: a] : $false ) )
        = ( ( ^ [C: a] :
                ( ( A @ C )
                & ~ ( B @ C ) ) )
          = A ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o] :
        ( ( ( ^ [C: a] :
                ( ( A @ C )
                & ( B @ C ) ) )
          = ( ^ [C: a] : $false ) )
        = ( ( ^ [C: a] :
                ( ( A @ C )
                & ~ ( B @ C ) ) )
          = A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = ( ^ [A: a] : $false ) )
   != ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = sk1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = sk1 )
   != ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = ( ^ [A: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
     != sk1 )
    | ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
     != ( ^ [A: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
     != sk1 )
    | ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
     != ( ^ [A: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
     != ( sk1 @ sk5 ) )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
      & ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
          & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
       != ( sk1 @ sk5 ) )
      | ( sk1 @ sk6 ) )
    & ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
          & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
       != ( sk1 @ sk5 ) )
      | ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
     != ( sk1 @ sk5 ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk5 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[54]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = sk1 )
    | ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = ( ^ [A: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = sk1 )
    | ( ( ^ [A: a] :
            ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ( sk2 @ A ) ) )
      = ( ^ [A: a] : $false ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
          & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) )
        = ( sk1 @ A ) )
      | ~ ( ( sk1 @ B )
          & ( sk2 @ B ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[10]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
          & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) )
        = ( sk1 @ A ) )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).

thf(557,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ B )
      | ( ( sk1 @ A )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ A ) )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(637,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
        | ~ ( sk2 @ B )
        | ( sk1 @ A )
        | ~ ( sk1 @ A ) )
      & ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
        | ~ ( sk2 @ B )
        | ~ ( sk2 @ A )
        | ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[557]) ).

thf(639,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ B )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[637]) ).

thf(774,plain,
    ! [B: a,A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ B )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ B )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( ( sk2 @ A )
       != ( sk2 @ B ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(eqfactor_ordered,[status(thm)],[639]) ).

thf(775,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[774:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(780,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[775]) ).

thf(799,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk5 )
       != ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[60,780]) ).

thf(800,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      | ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk5 )
       != ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[799]) ).

thf(801,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[800:[bind(A,$thf( sk5 ))]]) ).

thf(817,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ~ ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[801]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
     != ( sk1 @ sk5 ) )
    | ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(257,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(278,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) )
    & ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[257]) ).

thf(279,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[278]) ).

thf(281,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[279]) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) )
    & ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[55]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(793,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[64,780]) ).

thf(794,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk6 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[793]) ).

thf(795,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ~ ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[794:[bind(A,$thf( sk6 ))]]) ).

thf(869,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ~ $true
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[281,795]) ).

thf(870,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
     != ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[869]) ).

thf(871,plain,
    sk1 @ sk5,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[870:[]]) ).

thf(878,plain,
    ( ~ ( $true
        & ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ) )
    | ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[16,871]) ).

thf(879,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ sk5 )
    | ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[878]) ).

thf(889,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ~ ( sk2 @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[871,780]) ).

thf(890,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk2 @ A )
      | ( ( sk1 @ sk5 )
       != ( sk1 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[889]) ).

thf(891,plain,
    ~ ( sk2 @ sk5 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[890:[bind(A,$thf( sk5 ))]]) ).

thf(896,plain,
    ( $false
    | ( sk2 @ sk6 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[879,891]) ).

thf(897,plain,
    sk2 @ sk6,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[896]) ).

thf(906,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
       != ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[897,780]) ).

thf(907,plain,
    ! [A: a] :
      ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk6 )
       != ( sk2 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[906]) ).

thf(908,plain,
    ~ ( sk1 @ sk6 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[907:[bind(A,$thf( sk6 ))]]) ).

thf(926,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[817,871,908]) ).

thf(927,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[926]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET611^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.28  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.28  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.28  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.24/0.28  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:40:58 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.28  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.00/0.73  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.23/0.87  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (145ms). 
% 1.23/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.76/1.11  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.76/1.12  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.03/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.03/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.03/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.03/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.03/1.19  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 9.90/3.12  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 9.90/3.13  % Time passed: 2712ms (effective reasoning time: 2243ms)
% 9.90/3.13  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 9.90/3.13  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 9.90/3.13  % No. of inferences in proof: 54
% 9.90/3.13  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2712 ms resp. 2243 ms w/o parsing
% 8.91/3.17  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.91/3.17  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------