↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET611+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:14:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  37   ~;  40   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   6 sgn  31   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(member_equal,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
        <=> member(X3,X2) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',member_equal) ).

fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( ~ member(X3,X2)
        & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X2)
        & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(prove_th84,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersection(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> difference(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th84) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X9] : ~ member(X9,empty_set),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( X15 = X16
        | member(esk3_2(X15,X16),X16)
        | member(esk3_2(X15,X16),X15) )
      & ( X15 = X16
        | ~ member(esk3_2(X15,X16),X16)
        | ~ member(esk3_2(X15,X16),X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[member_equal])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( ~ member(X3,X2)
        & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( member(X12,intersection(X10,X11))
        | ~ member(X12,X11)
        | ~ member(X12,X10) )
      & ( ~ member(X12,intersection(X10,X11))
        | member(X12,X11) )
      & ( ~ member(X12,intersection(X10,X11))
        | member(X12,X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_defn])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( member(X8,difference(X6,X7))
        | member(X8,X7)
        | ~ member(X8,X6) )
      & ( ~ member(X8,difference(X6,X7))
        | ~ member(X8,X7) )
      & ( ~ member(X8,difference(X6,X7))
        | member(X8,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(X1,empty_set),X1)
    | X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(intersection(X1,X2),empty_set),X1)
    | intersection(X1,X2) = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X3,X2))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] : intersection(X13,X14) = intersection(X14,X13),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( intersection(X1,X2) = empty_set
      <=> difference(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th84]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk3_2(intersection(difference(X1,X2),X3),empty_set),X2)
    | intersection(difference(X1,X2),X3) = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | member(esk3_2(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X3)
    | intersection(X1,X2) = X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk1_0
      | intersection(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set )
    & ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk1_0
      | intersection(esk1_0,esk2_0) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | member(esk3_2(difference(X1,X2),X3),X3)
    | difference(X1,X2) = X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    intersection(X1,difference(X2,X1)) = empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_11]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk1_0
    | intersection(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(difference(X1,X2),X1),X1)
    | difference(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk3_2(difference(X1,X2),X1),difference(X1,X2))
    | difference(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(difference(X1,X2),X1),X2)
    | difference(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk1_0
    | intersection(esk1_0,esk2_0) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(esk3_2(difference(X1,esk2_0),X1),esk1_0)
    | difference(X1,esk2_0) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) != esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_30]),c_0_39]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET611+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:30:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.55  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.60/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % new_bool_3 with pid 1057109 completed with status 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.60/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.60/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.60/0.55  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.60/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1057119 completed with status 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.60/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.60/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.60/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.60/0.55  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.60/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.60/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.60/0.55  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.60/0.55  
% 0.60/0.55  % Proof found!
% 0.60/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.60/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.55  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.60/0.55  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.60/0.55  % Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.60/0.55  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.60/0.55  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.60/0.55  % Processed clauses                    : 1756
% 0.60/0.55  % ...of these trivial                  : 28
% 0.60/0.55  % ...subsumed                          : 1427
% 0.60/0.55  % ...remaining for further processing  : 301
% 0.60/0.55  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.60/0.55  % Generated clauses                    : 9250
% 0.60/0.55  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7327
% 0.60/0.55  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.60/0.55  % Paramodulations                      : 9174
% 0.60/0.55  % Factorizations                       : 76
% 0.60/0.55  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5734
% 0.60/0.55  % ...of those cached                   : 5549
% 0.60/0.55  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.60/0.55  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.60/0.55  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.60/0.55  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.60/0.55  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.60/0.55  % Current number of processed clauses  : 286
% 0.60/0.55  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 30
% 0.60/0.55  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.60/0.55  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.60/0.55  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 253
% 0.60/0.55  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5540
% 0.60/0.55  % ...number of literals in the above   : 14888
% 0.60/0.55  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.60/0.55  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19204
% 0.60/0.55  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11175
% 0.60/0.55  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1041
% 0.60/0.55  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1240
% 0.60/0.55  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 20
% 0.60/0.55  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.60/0.55  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.60/0.55  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 121178
% 0.60/0.55  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 297
% 0.60/0.55  
% 0.60/0.55  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.55  % User time                : 0.107 s
% 0.60/0.55  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.60/0.55  % Total time               : 0.118 s
% 0.60/0.55  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.60/0.55  
% 0.60/0.55  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.55  % User time                : 0.109 s
% 0.60/0.55  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.60/0.55  % Total time               : 0.124 s
% 0.60/0.55  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.60/0.55  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------