↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET615^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.94s 2.25s
% Output   : Refutation 4.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  104 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   28 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  246 (  53   ~;  42   |;  35   &; 116   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  19   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (  18   ^;  12   !;   0   ?;  33   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(union_decl,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(setminus_decl,type,
    setminus: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i > $o ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i > $o ).

thf(sk4_decl,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(union_def,definition,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ C )
          | ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(setminus_def,definition,
    ( setminus
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ C )
          & ~ ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
                    ( ( ( A @ D )
                      | ( B @ D ) )
                    & ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
              = ( ^ [D: $i] :
                    ( ( ( A @ D )
                      & ~ ( C @ D ) )
                    | ( ( B @ D )
                      & ~ ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ~ ! [B: $i > $o] :
              ( ( ^ [C: $i] :
                    ( ( ( sk1 @ C )
                      | ( A @ C ) )
                    & ~ ( B @ C ) ) )
              = ( ^ [C: $i] :
                    ( ( ( sk1 @ C )
                      & ~ ( B @ C ) )
                    | ( ( A @ C )
                      & ~ ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i > $o] :
          ( ( ^ [B: $i] :
                ( ( ( sk1 @ B )
                  | ( sk2 @ B ) )
                & ~ ( A @ B ) ) )
         != ( ^ [B: $i] :
                ( ( ( sk1 @ B )
                  & ~ ( A @ B ) )
                | ( ( sk2 @ B )
                  & ~ ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
      ( ( setminus @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( union @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) @ ( setminus @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
        ( ( setminus @ ( union @ A @ B ) @ C )
        = ( union @ ( setminus @ A @ C ) @ ( setminus @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $o,B: $i > $o,C: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ D )
                | ( B @ D ) )
              & ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
        = ( ^ [D: $i] :
              ( ( ( A @ D )
                & ~ ( C @ D ) )
              | ( ( B @ D )
                & ~ ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            | ( sk2 @ A ) )
          & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            | ( sk2 @ A ) )
          & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
   != ( ^ [A: $i] :
          ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) )
          | ( ( sk2 @ A )
            & ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
   != ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
    | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      & ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk1 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
    & ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
      | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
    | ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        | ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
      & ~ $false )
   != ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
        & ~ $false )
      | ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
        & ~ $false ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6,27]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET615^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:39:32 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.21/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (215ms). 
% 1.51/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.11/1.44  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.11/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.34/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.54/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.54/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.54/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.54/1.61  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.94/2.24  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.94/2.25  % Time passed: 1888ms (effective reasoning time: 1204ms)
% 3.94/2.25  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.94/2.25  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.94/2.25  % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 3.94/2.25  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1888 ms resp. 1204 ms w/o parsing
% 4.24/2.31  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.24/2.31  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------