↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET616+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  26   ~;  47   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   3 sgn  23   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(member_equal,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
        <=> member(D,C) )
     => B = C ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',member_equal) ).

fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( member(D,difference(B,C))
    <=> ( ~ member(D,C)
        & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( B = C
    <=> ( subset(C,B)
        & subset(B,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(prove_th90,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( difference(B,C) = difference(C,B)
     => B = C ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th90) ).

fof(prove_th90_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( difference(B,C) = difference(C,B)
       => B = C ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th90]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( C = B
      | ? [D] :
          ( ( ~ member(D,C)
            | ~ member(D,B) )
          & ( member(D,C)
            | member(D,B) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[member_equal]) ).

fof(sk_member_equal_sk,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( C = B
      | ( ( ~ member(sK0(B,C),C)
          | ~ member(sK0(B,C),B) )
        & ( member(sK0(B,C),C)
          | member(sK0(B,C),B) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(D,sK0(B,C))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_member_equal,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( VAR_1 = VAR_0
        | ~ member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | ~ member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( VAR_1 = VAR_0
        | member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_member_equal_sk]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( B = A
    | member(sK0(A,B),B)
    | member(sK0(A,B),A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_member_equal]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ member(sK0(A,B),B)
    | ~ member(sK0(A,B),A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_member_equal]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( member(A,B)
    | ~ member(A,difference(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(A,C)
    | ~ member(A,difference(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( member(A,C)
    | ~ member(A,B)
    | member(A,difference(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equal_defn]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subset_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [B,C] :
      ( C != B
      & difference(C,B) = difference(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th90_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th90_neg,plain,
    ( sK1 != sK2
    & difference(sK1,sK2) = difference(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(C,sK1)],[nnf_7]) ).

cnf(c_24,negated_conjecture,
    difference(sK1,sK2) = difference(sK2,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th90_neg]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th90_neg]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ( B = A
    | member(sK0(A,B),A)
    | member(sK0(A,B),C)
    | member(sK0(A,B),difference(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    ( B = A
    | member(sK0(A,B),B)
    | member(sK0(A,B),C)
    | member(sK0(A,B),difference(A,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_65,plain,
    subset(difference(sK1,sK2),difference(sK2,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    ( member(A,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,difference(sK2,sK1)) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_129,plain,
    ( member(A,difference(sK2,sK1))
    | ~ member(A,difference(sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_309,plain,
    ( member(sK0(A,sK2),sK1)
    | sK2 = A
    | member(sK0(A,sK2),A)
    | member(sK0(A,sK2),sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_212,plain,
    ( sK2 = A
    | member(sK0(A,sK2),A)
    | member(sK0(A,sK2),sK1) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_309]) ).

cnf(c_310,plain,
    ( sK2 = sK1
    | member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK1) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_212]) ).

cnf(c_311,plain,
    ( sK1 = sK2
    | member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK1) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_310]) ).

cnf(c_231,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_311]) ).

cnf(c_312,plain,
    ( member(sK0(sK1,A),difference(sK2,sK1))
    | A = sK1
    | member(sK0(sK1,A),A)
    | member(sK0(sK1,A),sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_129]) ).

cnf(c_259,plain,
    ( member(sK0(sK1,A),difference(sK2,sK1))
    | sK1 = A
    | member(sK0(sK1,A),A)
    | member(sK0(sK1,A),sK2) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_312]) ).

cnf(c_313,plain,
    ( member(sK0(sK1,sK2),difference(sK2,sK1))
    | sK1 = sK2
    | member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_259]) ).

cnf(c_276,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(sK0(sK1,sK2),difference(sK2,sK1))
    | member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_313]) ).

cnf(c_314,plain,
    ( sK2 = sK1
    | ~ member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_231,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_315,plain,
    ( sK1 = sK2
    | ~ member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_314]) ).

cnf(c_306,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK0(sK1,sK2),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_315]) ).

cnf(c_307,plain,
    ~ member(sK0(sK1,sK2),difference(A,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_231]) ).

cnf(c_316,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0(sK1,sK2),difference(sK2,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_306,c_276]) ).

cnf(c_308,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_307,c_316]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET616+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:55:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.36  % Process 216066 was started by sandbox on n017,
% 0.10/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 07:55:48 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.14/0.39  % Length of proof is 26.
% 0.14/0.39  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.14/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 30.000.
% 0.14/0.39  % Given clauses 41.
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------