↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET617+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:38 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  40 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  22   ~;  10   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   1 sgn  11   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

fof(union_empty_set,axiom,
    ! [B] : union(B,empty_set) = B,
    file('theBenchmark.p',union_empty_set) ).

fof(no_difference_with_empty_set1,axiom,
    ! [B] : difference(B,empty_set) = B,
    file('theBenchmark.p',no_difference_with_empty_set1) ).

fof(no_difference_with_empty_set2,axiom,
    ! [B] : difference(empty_set,B) = empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',no_difference_with_empty_set2) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : union(B,C) = union(C,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(commutativity_of_symmetric_difference,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = symmetric_difference(C,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_symmetric_difference) ).

fof(prove_th92,conjecture,
    ! [B] :
      ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,B) = B
      & symmetric_difference(B,empty_set) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th92) ).

fof(prove_th92_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B] :
        ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,B) = B
        & symmetric_difference(B,empty_set) = B ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th92]) ).

fof(nnf_13,plain,
    ? [B] :
      ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,B) != B
      | symmetric_difference(B,empty_set) != B ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th92_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th92_neg,plain,
    ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,sK0) != sK0
    | symmetric_difference(sK0,empty_set) != sK0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_13]) ).

cnf(c_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,sK0) != sK0
    | symmetric_difference(sK0,empty_set) != sK0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th92_neg]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    symmetric_difference(A,B) = symmetric_difference(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_symmetric_difference]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    union(A,B) = union(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    difference(empty_set,A) = empty_set,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[no_difference_with_empty_set2]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    difference(A,empty_set) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[no_difference_with_empty_set1]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    union(A,empty_set) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[union_empty_set]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    union(difference(A,B),difference(B,A)) = symmetric_difference(A,B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    symmetric_difference(A,B) = union(difference(A,B),difference(B,A)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_35]) ).

cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,sK0) != sK0
    | symmetric_difference(empty_set,sK0) != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,sK0) != sK0
    | union(difference(empty_set,sK0),difference(sK0,empty_set)) != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,sK0) != sK0
    | union(empty_set,difference(sK0,empty_set)) != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( symmetric_difference(empty_set,sK0) != sK0
    | union(empty_set,sK0) != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ( union(difference(empty_set,sK0),difference(sK0,empty_set)) != sK0
    | union(empty_set,sK0) != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    ( union(empty_set,difference(sK0,empty_set)) != sK0
    | union(empty_set,sK0) != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( union(empty_set,sK0) != sK0
    | union(empty_set,sK0) != sK0 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    union(empty_set,sK0) != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    A = union(empty_set,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    union(empty_set,A) = A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_37]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET617+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.44  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:01:09 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.45  % Process 3150191 was started by sandbox on n008,
% 0.08/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 08:01:09 2026
% 0.08/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.46  
% 0.08/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.08/0.49  
% 0.08/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.49  
% 0.08/0.49  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.08/0.49  % Length of proof is 18.
% 0.08/0.49  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.08/0.49  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.08/0.49  % Given clauses 17.
% 0.08/0.49  
% 0.08/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------