↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET619+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.28s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  29 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   2 sgn  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th95,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),intersection(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th95) ).

fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

fof(associativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : union(union(X1,X2),X3) = union(X1,union(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_union) ).

fof(union_intersection,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,intersection(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_intersection) ).

fof(union_intersection_difference,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(intersection(X1,X2),difference(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_intersection_difference) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),intersection(X1,X2)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th95]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    union(esk3_0,esk4_0) != union(symmetric_difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] : symmetric_difference(X36,X37) = union(difference(X36,X37),difference(X37,X36)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X38,X39,X40] : union(union(X38,X39),X40) = union(X38,union(X39,X40)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[associativity_of_union]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] : union(X41,intersection(X41,X42)) = X41,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[union_intersection]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X43,X44] : union(intersection(X43,X44),difference(X43,X44)) = X43,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[union_intersection_difference]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X55,X56] : intersection(X55,X56) = intersection(X56,X55),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    union(esk3_0,esk4_0) != union(symmetric_difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] : union(X53,X54) = union(X54,X53),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    union(union(X1,X2),X3) = union(X1,union(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    union(X1,intersection(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    union(intersection(X1,X2),difference(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    union(esk3_0,esk4_0) != union(union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    union(X1,union(intersection(X1,X2),X3)) = union(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    union(intersection(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    union(intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0),union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0))) != union(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    union(intersection(X1,X2),union(difference(X1,X2),X3)) = union(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    union(X1,difference(X2,X1)) = union(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET619+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:30:17 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.28/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.28/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.72  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------