%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SET621^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:03 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.91s 2.63s
% Output : Refutation 5.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 22
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 52 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 3 def)
% Number of atoms : 389 ( 27 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 114 ( 7 avg)
% Number of connectives : 887 ( 215 ~; 245 |; 92 &; 335 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 34 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 15 ( 15 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 16 ^; 12 !; 0 ?; 31 :)
% ( 0 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 3 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(sk1_decl,type,
sk1: a > $o ).
thf(sk2_decl,type,
sk2: a > $o ).
thf(sk3_decl,type,
sk3: a > $o ).
thf(sk4_decl,type,
sk4: a ).
thf(sk5_decl,type,
sk5: $o ).
thf(sk1_def,definition,
( sk1
= ( @+[A: a > $o] :
~ ! [B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( B @ D ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( A @ D ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( ( B @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( ( A @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(sk2_def,definition,
( sk2
= ( @+[A: a > $o] :
~ ! [B: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [C: a] :
( ( ( ( sk1 @ C )
& ~ ( A @ C ) )
| ( ( A @ C )
& ~ ( sk1 @ C ) ) )
& ~ ( B @ C ) ) )
= ( ^ [C: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ C )
& ~ ( ( A @ C )
| ( B @ C ) ) )
| ( ( A @ C )
& ~ ( ( sk1 @ C )
| ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(sk3_def,definition,
( sk3
= ( @+[A: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [B: a] :
( ( ( ( sk1 @ B )
& ~ ( sk2 @ B ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ B )
& ~ ( sk1 @ B ) ) )
& ~ ( A @ B ) ) )
!= ( ^ [B: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ B )
& ~ ( ( sk2 @ B )
| ( A @ B ) ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ B )
& ~ ( ( sk1 @ B )
| ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( B @ D ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( A @ D ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( ( B @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( ( A @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_97_pme) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( B @ D ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( A @ D ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( ( B @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( ( A @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(3,plain,
~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( B @ D ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( A @ D ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ D ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
& ~ ( ( B @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ~ ( ( A @ D )
| ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
& ~ ( sk2 @ A ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ A )
& ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
& ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
!= ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ A )
& ~ ( ( sk2 @ A )
| ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ A )
& ~ ( ( sk1 @ A )
| ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( ( ( sk1 @ A )
& ~ ( sk2 @ A ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ A )
& ~ ( sk1 @ A ) ) )
& ~ ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
!= ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ A )
& ~ ( ( sk2 @ A )
| ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ A )
& ~ ( ( sk1 @ A )
| ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,plain,
( ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
& ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
!= ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[5]) ).
thf(7,plain,
( ~ ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
& ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
| ~ ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(9,plain,
( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[7]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(13,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(8,plain,
( ( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) )
& ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
| ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ),
inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(16,plain,
( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| sk5 )
& ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[8]) ).
thf(32,plain,
( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(49,plain,
( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
thf(65,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ $true
| ~ sk5
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,49]) ).
thf(66,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
thf(67,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[66:[]]) ).
thf(39,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(43,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
thf(99,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ~ $true
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[67,43]) ).
thf(100,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[99]) ).
thf(101,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ sk5 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[100:[]]) ).
thf(37,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(45,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
thf(12,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(15,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(114,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ~ $true
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[45,15]) ).
thf(115,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[114]) ).
thf(116,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[115:[]]) ).
thf(33,plain,
( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(47,plain,
( ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[33]) ).
thf(138,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ~ $true
| sk5
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[116,47]) ).
thf(139,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[138]) ).
thf(140,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[139:[]]) ).
thf(68,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ $true
| sk5
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,47]) ).
thf(69,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[68]) ).
thf(70,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[69:[]]) ).
thf(18,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(44,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(108,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ~ $true
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[70,44]) ).
thf(109,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[108]) ).
thf(110,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| sk5 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[109:[]]) ).
thf(151,plain,
( sk5
| ~ $true
| sk5
| ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[140,110]) ).
thf(152,plain,
( sk5
| ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[151]) ).
thf(153,plain,
sk5,
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[152:[]]) ).
thf(163,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ $true ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[101,153]) ).
thf(164,plain,
~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[163]) ).
thf(169,plain,
( ( ( ( $false
& ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ $false ) )
& ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
!= ( ( $false
& ~ ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ~ ( $false
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[6,164]) ).
thf(170,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[169]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SET621^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.08/0.19 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:43:02 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.76 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.20/0.95 % [INFO] Parsing done (185ms).
% 1.20/0.97 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.81/1.37 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.81/1.38 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.01/1.47 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.19/1.50 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.19/1.51 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.19/1.51 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.19/1.52 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.91/2.61 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.91/2.62 % Time passed: 2289ms (effective reasoning time: 1643ms)
% 4.91/2.62 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.91/2.62 % Axioms used in derivation (0):
% 4.91/2.62 % No. of inferences in proof: 49
% 4.91/2.63 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2289 ms resp. 1643 ms w/o parsing
% 5.19/2.71 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.19/2.71 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------