↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET622^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:23 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   29
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  101 (  19 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  824 ( 193 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1010 ( 163   ~; 233   |; 164   &; 444   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  18   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  12   !;   6   ?;  40   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
              & ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                  | ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
            | ( ( X1 @ X4 )
              & ( X0 @ X4 )
              & ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) )
      = ( ^ [X3: a] :
            ( ~ ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                  & ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
                | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                  & ~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
            & ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_98_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                & ~ ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                    | ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
              | ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                & ( X0 @ X4 )
                & ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ~ ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                    & ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
                  | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                    & ~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
              & ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ~ ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                    | ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
              | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                & ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ( ~ ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                    & ~ ( X0 @ X4 ) )
                  | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                    & ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) )
              & ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( ( ~ ( X2 @ Y0 )
                    & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                  | ( ~ ( X0 @ Y0 )
                    & ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 )
                & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                    | ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( ~ ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( ~ ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 )
              & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  | ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ( X2 @ Y0 )
              & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ~ ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  | ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( ~ ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( ~ ( X1 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
          & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
          & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
          & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      @ sK3 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                  | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                  & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
                  & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                  & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
                  & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
                  | ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
            | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
            | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f44]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
              & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f57]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f57]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
            | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f59]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
            | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f63]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
    = $true ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
              | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
          & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f58]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
            | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f84]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
            | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f85]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f87]) ).

thf(f89,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f90]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f94]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f95]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f96]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f100]) ).

thf(f124,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f89]) ).

thf(f125,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f124]) ).

thf(f129,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f125]) ).

thf(f130,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f129]) ).

thf(f131,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f130]) ).

thf(f165,definition,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f167,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f165]) ).

thf(f169,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f171,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f169]) ).

thf(f173,definition,
    ( spl4_3
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f175,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f173]) ).

thf(f176,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f28,f173,f169,f165]) ).

thf(f178,definition,
    ( spl4_4
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f180,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f178]) ).

thf(f182,definition,
    ( spl4_5
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f184,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f182]) ).

thf(f185,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f56,f182,f169,f178]) ).

thf(f187,definition,
    ( spl4_6
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f189,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f187]) ).

thf(f194,plain,
    spl4_6,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f77,f187]) ).

thf(f197,plain,
    ( spl4_3
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f101,f182,f173]) ).

thf(f200,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f131,f165,f178]) ).

thf(f205,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f180,f175]) ).

thf(f206,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f205]) ).

thf(f207,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f206]) ).

thf(f209,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f184,f167]) ).

thf(f210,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f209]) ).

thf(f211,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f210]) ).

thf(f213,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f189,f171]) ).

thf(f217,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f213]) ).

thf(f218,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f217]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f176]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | spl4_4
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f185]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    spl4_6,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f194]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    ( spl4_3
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f197]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f200]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f207]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f211]) ).

cnf(s21,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f218]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s21,s7]) ).

cnf(s23,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s22]) ).

cnf(s24,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s22]) ).

cnf(s25,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s18,s24,s13]) ).

cnf(s26,plain,
    ~ spl4_5,
    inference(rat,[],[s19,s25]) ).

cnf(s27,plain,
    spl4_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s10,s26]) ).

cnf(s28,plain,
    spl4_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s23,s26]) ).

cnf(s29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s18,s28,s27]) ).

thf(f219,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s29]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET622^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.17  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:44:34 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.27  % (363195)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=588902450:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (363202)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=1602040850:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363200)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3928559662:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363203)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=1625875959:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363204)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=532104317:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-363195-363201"...
% 0.21/0.27  % (363200) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-363195-363200"...
% 0.21/0.27  % (363204) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-363195-363204"...
% 0.21/0.27  % (363203) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-363195-363203"...
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)dis+10_1024_sil=128000:si=on:sp=unary_first:urr=on:uwa=all:fd=off:random_seed=29515772:i=2:hud=10:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.27  % (363208)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.27  % (363200)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.27  % (363204)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.21/0.27  % (363201)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.21/0.27  % (363195)Success in time 0.039 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------