↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET622+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:39 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (  10   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  18   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(associativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] : intersection(intersection(B,C),D) = intersection(B,intersection(C,D)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(difference_difference_union2,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] : difference(B,difference(C,D)) = union(difference(B,C),intersection(B,D)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',difference_difference_union2) ).

fof(symmetric_difference_and_difference,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = difference(union(B,C),intersection(B,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_and_difference) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : union(B,C) = union(C,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(prove_th98,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D] : difference(B,symmetric_difference(C,D)) = union(difference(B,union(C,D)),intersection(intersection(B,C),D)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th98) ).

fof(prove_th98_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D] : difference(B,symmetric_difference(C,D)) = union(difference(B,union(C,D)),intersection(intersection(B,C),D)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th98]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    intersection(intersection(A,B),C) = intersection(A,intersection(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[associativity_of_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    union(difference(A,B),intersection(A,C)) = difference(A,difference(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference_difference_union2]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    symmetric_difference(A,B) = difference(union(A,B),intersection(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_and_difference]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    union(A,B) = union(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    intersection(A,B) = intersection(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

fof(nnf_15,plain,
    ? [B,C,D] : union(difference(B,union(C,D)),intersection(intersection(B,C),D)) != difference(B,symmetric_difference(C,D)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th98_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th98_neg,plain,
    union(difference(sK0,union(sK1,sK2)),intersection(intersection(sK0,sK1),sK2)) != difference(sK0,symmetric_difference(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1),skolemize(D,sK2)],[nnf_15]) ).

cnf(c_44,negated_conjecture,
    union(difference(sK0,union(sK1,sK2)),intersection(intersection(sK0,sK1),sK2)) != difference(sK0,symmetric_difference(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th98_neg]) ).

cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    union(difference(sK0,union(sK1,sK2)),intersection(sK2,intersection(sK0,sK1))) != difference(sK0,symmetric_difference(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    union(intersection(sK2,intersection(sK0,sK1)),difference(sK0,union(sK1,sK2))) != difference(sK0,symmetric_difference(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    union(intersection(sK2,intersection(sK0,sK1)),difference(sK0,union(sK1,sK2))) != difference(sK0,difference(union(sK1,sK2),intersection(sK1,sK2))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_61]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    union(intersection(A,B),difference(A,C)) = difference(A,difference(C,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    intersection(intersection(A,B),C) = intersection(B,intersection(A,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    intersection(A,intersection(B,C)) = intersection(B,intersection(A,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    union(intersection(sK0,intersection(sK2,sK1)),difference(sK0,union(sK1,sK2))) != difference(sK0,difference(union(sK1,sK2),intersection(sK1,sK2))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    union(intersection(sK0,intersection(sK1,sK2)),difference(sK0,union(sK1,sK2))) != difference(sK0,difference(union(sK1,sK2),intersection(sK1,sK2))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    difference(sK0,difference(union(sK1,sK2),intersection(sK1,sK2))) != difference(sK0,difference(union(sK1,sK2),intersection(sK1,sK2))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET622+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:00:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.14/0.38  % Process 3769652 was started by sandbox on n009,
% 0.14/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 08:00:59 2026
% 0.14/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/0.41  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.14/0.41  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.14/0.41  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.14/0.41  % Given clauses 18.
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------