↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET624^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:22:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   44 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  278 (  33   ~;  81   |;  16   &; 145   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (  10   ^;  18   !;   5   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_28,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_35,type,
    meets: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    epred1_0: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    epred2_0: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_39,type,
    epred3_0: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_40,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_41,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_42,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(thm,conjecture,
    ! [X22: $i > $o,X23: $i > $o,X24: $i > $o] :
      ( ( meets @ X22 @ ( union @ X23 @ X24 ) )
    <=> ( ( meets @ X22 @ X23 )
        | ( meets @ X22 @ X24 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hviheyFz9N/E---3.1_3165590.p',thm) ).

thf(union,axiom,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o,X4: $i] :
          ( ( X5 @ X4 )
          | ( X6 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hviheyFz9N/E---3.1_3165590.p',union) ).

thf(meets,axiom,
    ( meets
    = ( ^ [X18: $i > $o,X19: $i > $o] :
        ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( X18 @ X4 )
          & ( X19 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hviheyFz9N/E---3.1_3165590.p',meets) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X22: $i > $o,X23: $i > $o,X24: $i > $o] :
        ( ( meets @ X22 @ ( union @ X23 @ X24 ) )
      <=> ( ( meets @ X22 @ X23 )
          | ( meets @ X22 @ X24 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]) ).

thf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[union]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( meets
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
          & ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[meets]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X22: $i > $o,X23: $i > $o,X24: $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X28: $i] :
            ( ( X22 @ X28 )
            & ( ( X23 @ X28 )
              | ( X24 @ X28 ) ) )
      <=> ( ? [X29: $i] :
              ( ( X22 @ X29 )
              & ( X23 @ X29 ) )
          | ? [X30: $i] :
              ( ( X22 @ X30 )
              & ( X24 @ X30 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X34: $i,X35: $i,X36: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X35 )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X35 )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X34 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X36 )
        | ~ ( epred3_0 @ X36 )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X34 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X35 )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X35 )
        | ~ ( epred3_0 @ X34 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X36 )
        | ~ ( epred3_0 @ X36 )
        | ~ ( epred3_0 @ X34 )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X34 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
        | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
        | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
        | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
        | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( epred3_0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( epred3_0 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( epred3_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(condense,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(condense,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0 @ esk1_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]),c_0_15]),c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ~ ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_22]),c_0_20])]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_23]),c_0_20])]),c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0 @ esk2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_25]),c_0_20])]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk2_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_28]),c_0_27])]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_29]),c_0_20])]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred3_0 @ esk1_0 )
    | ( epred3_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_30]),c_0_20])]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0 @ esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_31]),c_0_20])]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    epred3_0 @ esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).

thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_34]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET624^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.17  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:40:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hviheyFz9N/E---3.1_3165590.p
% 0.10/0.24  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.10/0.24  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.10/0.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting sh1l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % new_ho_9 with pid 3165617 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Result found by new_ho_9
% 0.10/0.24  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.10/0.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.24  % Search class: HGHNF-FFSM00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.10/0.24  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting new_ho_9 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % sh5l with pid 3165624 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.10/0.24  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.10/0.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.24  % Search class: HGHNF-FFSM00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.10/0.24  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting new_ho_9 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.24  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.24  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.24  
% 0.10/0.24  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.24  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.24  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.24  % Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.10/0.24  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Initial clauses                      : 26
% 0.10/0.24  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
% 0.10/0.24  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.10/0.24  % Processed clauses                    : 37
% 0.10/0.24  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.10/0.24  % ...remaining for further processing  : 35
% 0.10/0.24  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 0.10/0.24  % Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.10/0.24  % Generated clauses                    : 16
% 0.10/0.24  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.10/0.24  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 0.10/0.24  % Paramodulations                      : 16
% 0.10/0.24  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Total rewrite steps                  : 19
% 0.10/0.24  % ...of those cached                   : 15
% 0.10/0.24  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.24  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.10/0.24  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.10/0.24  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.24  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.10/0.24  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.24  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % Current number of archived clauses   : 29
% 0.10/0.24  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45
% 0.10/0.24  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.10/0.24  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
% 0.10/0.24  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.10/0.24  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.24  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.10/0.24  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.10/0.24  % Condensation attempts                : 37
% 0.10/0.24  % Condensation successes               : 2
% 0.10/0.24  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1724
% 0.10/0.24  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 336
% 0.10/0.24  
% 0.10/0.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.24  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.24  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.24  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.24  % Maximum resident set size: 3916 pages
% 0.10/0.24  
% 0.10/0.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.24  % User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.10/0.24  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.10/0.24  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.10/0.24  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.24  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------