↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET625+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:39 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  26   ~;  19   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn  26   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,C)
          & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(symmetry_of_intersect,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
     => intersect(C,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_intersect) ).

fof(prove_th101,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( subset(C,D)
        & intersect(B,C) )
     => intersect(B,D) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th101) ).

fof(prove_th101_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D] :
        ( ( subset(C,D)
          & intersect(B,C) )
       => intersect(B,D) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th101]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subset_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_5,plain,
    ? [B,C,D] :
      ( ~ intersect(B,D)
      & subset(C,D)
      & intersect(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th101_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th101_neg,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK2,sK1)
    & subset(sK0,sK1)
    & intersect(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(C,sK0),skolemize(D,sK1)],[nnf_5]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th101_neg]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(A,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(sK2,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th101_neg]) ).

cnf(c_15,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(sK2,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th101_neg]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( intersect(B,A)
    | ~ intersect(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_intersect]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ! [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            | ~ member(D,B) )
        | intersect(B,C) )
      & ( ? [X0] :
            ( member(X0,C)
            & member(X0,B) )
        | ~ intersect(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn]) ).

fof(sk_intersect_defn_sk,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ! [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            | ~ member(D,B) )
        | intersect(B,C) )
      & ( ( member(sK3(B,C),C)
          & member(sK3(B,C),B) )
        | ~ intersect(B,C) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK3(B,C))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_intersect_defn,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | intersect(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | ~ intersect(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | ~ intersect(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_intersect_defn_sk]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | intersect(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_intersect_defn]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( member(sK3(A,B),B)
    | ~ intersect(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_intersect_defn]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( member(sK3(A,B),A)
    | ~ intersect(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_intersect_defn]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(sK1,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    member(sK3(sK2,sK0),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    member(sK3(sK2,sK0),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    member(sK3(sK2,sK0),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    ( ~ member(A,sK2)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    ~ member(sK3(sK2,sK0),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_41]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET625+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:01:17 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.36  % Process 2579731 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.12/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:01:17 2026
% 0.12/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.12/0.37  % Length of proof is 18.
% 0.12/0.37  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.12/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.12/0.37  % Given clauses 15.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------