↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET626+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  22   ~;  19   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   2 sgn  23   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersect(X1,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
          & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(prove_th102,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( intersect(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
     => intersect(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th102) ).

fof(symmetry_of_intersect,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersect(X1,X2)
     => intersect(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_intersect) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X26,X27,X28] :
      ( ( member(esk1_2(X23,X24),X23)
        | ~ intersect(X23,X24) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X23,X24),X24)
        | ~ intersect(X23,X24) )
      & ( ~ member(X28,X26)
        | ~ member(X28,X27)
        | intersect(X26,X27) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( member(X22,X20)
        | ~ member(X22,intersection(X20,X21)) )
      & ( member(X22,X21)
        | ~ member(X22,intersection(X20,X21)) )
      & ( ~ member(X22,X20)
        | ~ member(X22,X21)
        | member(X22,intersection(X20,X21)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( intersect(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( intersect(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
       => intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th102]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,X2)
    | ~ intersect(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2)
    | ~ intersect(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0))
    & ~ intersect(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] :
      ( ~ intersect(X31,X32)
      | intersect(X32,X31) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_intersect])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,X2)
    | ~ intersect(X2,intersection(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( intersect(X2,X1)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET626+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:30:02 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.71  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------