↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SET627+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:57:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 5.47s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  33   ~;  22   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   1 sgn  33   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [B] : ~ member(B,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,C)
          & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(disjoint_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( disjoint(B,C)
    <=> ~ intersect(B,C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

fof(prove_th104,conjecture,
    ! [B] : disjoint(B,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th104) ).

fof(f_1_1,plain,
    ! [B] : ~ member(B,empty_set),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(f_1_2,plain,
    ! [U_0] : ~ member(U_0,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

cnf(f_1_3,plain,
    ~ member(U_0,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_2_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( intersect(B,C)
        | ! [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            | ~ member(D,B) ) )
      & ( ? [D] :
            ( member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) )
        | ~ intersect(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn]) ).

fof(f_2_2,plain,
    ! [U_4,U_3] :
      ( ( intersect(U_4,U_3)
        | ! [U_2] :
            ( ~ member(U_2,U_3)
            | ~ member(U_2,U_4) ) )
      & ( ? [U_1] :
            ( member(U_1,U_3)
            & member(U_1,U_4) )
        | ~ intersect(U_4,U_3) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_2_1]) ).

fof(f_2_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_8,U_6] :
        ( intersect(U_8,U_6)
        | ! [U_2] :
            ( ~ member(U_2,U_6)
            | ~ member(U_2,U_8) ) )
    & ! [U_7,U_5] :
        ( ? [U_1] :
            ( member(U_1,U_5)
            & member(U_1,U_7) )
        | ~ intersect(U_7,U_5) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_2_2]) ).

fof(f_2_4,plain,
    ( ! [U_8,U_6] :
        ( intersect(U_8,U_6)
        | ! [U_2] :
            ( ~ member(U_2,U_6)
            | ~ member(U_2,U_8) ) )
    & ! [U_7,U_5] :
        ( ( member(sK1(U_7,U_5),U_5)
          & member(sK1(U_7,U_5),U_7) )
        | ~ intersect(U_7,U_5) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_1,sK1(U_7,U_5))],[f_2_3]) ).

cnf(f_2_6,plain,
    ( member(sK1(U_7,U_5),U_5)
    | ~ intersect(U_7,U_5) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_2_4]) ).

fof(f_3_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( disjoint(B,C)
        | intersect(B,C) )
      & ( ~ intersect(B,C)
        | ~ disjoint(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

fof(f_3_2,plain,
    ! [U_10,U_9] :
      ( ( disjoint(U_10,U_9)
        | intersect(U_10,U_9) )
      & ( ~ intersect(U_10,U_9)
        | ~ disjoint(U_10,U_9) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_3_1]) ).

fof(f_3_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_14,U_12] :
        ( disjoint(U_14,U_12)
        | intersect(U_14,U_12) )
    & ! [U_13,U_11] :
        ( ~ intersect(U_13,U_11)
        | ~ disjoint(U_13,U_11) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_3_2]) ).

cnf(f_3_5,plain,
    ( disjoint(U_14,U_12)
    | intersect(U_14,U_12) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_3]) ).

fof(f_6_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B] : disjoint(B,empty_set),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[prove_th104]) ).

fof(f_6_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [B] : ~ disjoint(B,empty_set),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_6_1]) ).

fof(f_6_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_22] : ~ disjoint(U_22,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_6_2]) ).

fof(f_6_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(sK3,empty_set),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_22,sK3)],[f_6_3]) ).

fof(f_6_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(sK3,empty_set),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_6_4]) ).

cnf(f_6_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(sK3,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_6_5]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ member(sK1(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_1_3]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(sK3,empty_set)
    | member(sK1(sK3,empty_set),empty_set) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_2_6]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( disjoint(sK3,empty_set)
    | intersect(sK3,empty_set) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_3_5]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ~ disjoint(sK3,empty_set),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[f_6_6]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET627+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.44  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.45  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 22:39:16 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/5.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------