↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET627+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:30:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.45s 7.34s
% Output   : Refutation 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  10   ~;   0   |;   6   &;  57   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0   ^;  22   !;   3   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(disjoint_decl,type,
    disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(empty_set_decl,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

thf(member_decl,type,
    member: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(intersect_decl,type,
    intersect: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( empty_set @ ( A @ member ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( empty_set @ ( A @ member ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
    <=> ~ ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
       => ~ ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ empty )
    <=> ! [B: $i] :
          ~ ( A @ ( B @ member ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_defn) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( A @ ( B @ member ) )
       => ( A @ empty ) )
      & ( ( A @ empty )
       => ! [B: $i] :
            ~ ( A @ ( B @ member ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) )
    <=> ? [C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
          & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ? [C: $i] :
            ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
            & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) )
       => ? [C: $i] :
            ( ( B @ ( C @ member ) )
            & ( A @ ( C @ member ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ intersect ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_intersect) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ intersect ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ intersect ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] : ( empty_set @ ( A @ disjoint ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th104) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] : ( empty_set @ ( A @ disjoint ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] : ( empty_set @ ( A @ disjoint ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,20,28,13,26,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET627+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/5.40  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/5.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/5.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/5.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/5.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/5.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/5.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/5.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:01:57 UTC 2026
% 0.15/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/5.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.17/6.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.26/6.19  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (187ms). 
% 1.39/6.20  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.00/6.62  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.00/6.63  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.19/6.71  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.19/6.75  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.19/6.76  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.19/6.77  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.19/6.77  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.45/7.33  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.45/7.33  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.45/7.33  % Time passed: 1779ms (effective reasoning time: 1123ms)
% 3.45/7.33  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.45/7.33  % Axioms used in derivation (5): empty_defn, disjoint_defn, symmetry_of_intersect, empty_set_defn, intersect_defn
% 3.45/7.33  % No. of inferences in proof: 14
% 3.45/7.34  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1779 ms resp. 1123 ms w/o parsing
% 3.45/7.38  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.45/7.38  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------