↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET630+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:40 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 5.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  13   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   0 sgn  15   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

fof(intersect_with_union,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( intersect(B,union(C,D))
    <=> ( intersect(B,D)
        | intersect(B,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersect_with_union) ).

fof(intersection_and_union_disjoint,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : disjoint(intersection(B,C),difference(B,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersection_and_union_disjoint) ).

fof(disjoint_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( disjoint(B,C)
    <=> ~ intersect(B,C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(prove_intersection_and_symmetric_difference_disjoint,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] : disjoint(intersection(B,C),symmetric_difference(B,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_intersection_and_symmetric_difference_disjoint) ).

fof(prove_intersection_and_symmetric_difference_disjoint_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] : disjoint(intersection(B,C),symmetric_difference(B,C)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_intersection_and_symmetric_difference_disjoint]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    union(difference(A,B),difference(B,A)) = symmetric_difference(A,B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    symmetric_difference(A,B) = union(difference(A,B),difference(B,A)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_13]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( intersect(A,C)
    | intersect(A,B)
    | ~ intersect(A,union(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intersect_with_union]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    disjoint(intersection(A,B),difference(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intersection_and_union_disjoint]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(A,B)
    | ~ disjoint(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( intersect(A,B)
    | disjoint(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    intersection(A,B) = intersection(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

fof(nnf_12,plain,
    ? [B,C] : ~ disjoint(intersection(B,C),symmetric_difference(B,C)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_intersection_and_symmetric_difference_disjoint_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_intersection_and_symmetric_difference_disjoint_neg,plain,
    ~ disjoint(intersection(sK0,sK1),symmetric_difference(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1)],[nnf_12]) ).

cnf(c_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(intersection(sK0,sK1),symmetric_difference(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_intersection_and_symmetric_difference_disjoint_neg]) ).

cnf(c_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(intersection(sK0,sK1),union(difference(sK0,sK1),difference(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    ~ intersect(intersection(A,B),difference(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_68,plain,
    intersect(intersection(sK0,sK1),union(difference(sK0,sK1),difference(sK1,sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    ~ intersect(intersection(A,B),difference(B,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    ( intersect(intersection(A,B),C)
    | ~ intersect(intersection(A,B),union(difference(A,B),C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    ~ intersect(intersection(A,B),union(difference(A,B),difference(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_68]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET630+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:05:03 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/5.36  % Process 3522385 was started by sandbox on n015,
% 0.09/5.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:05:03 2026
% 0.09/5.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/5.37  
% 0.09/5.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/5.38  
% 0.09/5.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/5.38  
% 0.09/5.38  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/5.38  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.09/5.38  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.09/5.38  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.09/5.38  % Given clauses 27.
% 0.09/5.38  
% 0.09/5.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------