↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET632+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.28s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  113 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  112 (  46   ~;  39   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   6 sgn  41   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(empty_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ member(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_defn) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(prove_th114,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X1,X3)
        & disjoint(X2,X3) )
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th114) ).

fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersect(X1,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
          & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(disjoint_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ member(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X23,X24)
        | ~ member(X25,X23)
        | member(X25,X24) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X26,X27),X26)
        | subset(X26,X27) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X26,X27),X27)
        | subset(X26,X27) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X43,X44,X45] :
      ( ( ~ empty(X43)
        | ~ member(X44,X43) )
      & ( member(esk3_1(X45),X45)
        | empty(X45) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X1,X3)
          & disjoint(X2,X3) )
       => X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th114]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X32,X33,X34] :
      ( ( member(esk2_2(X29,X30),X29)
        | ~ intersect(X29,X30) )
      & ( member(esk2_2(X29,X30),X30)
        | ~ intersect(X29,X30) )
      & ( ~ member(X34,X32)
        | ~ member(X34,X33)
        | intersect(X32,X33) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(esk3_1(X1),X1)
    | empty(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & subset(esk4_0,esk6_0)
    & disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    & esk4_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( intersect(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | member(esk3_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk4_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ member(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( empty(X1)
    | intersect(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(esk3_1(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty(esk4_0)
    | member(esk3_1(esk4_0),esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X38,X39] :
      ( ( subset(X38,X39)
        | X38 != X39 )
      & ( subset(X39,X38)
        | X38 != X39 )
      & ( ~ subset(X38,X39)
        | ~ subset(X39,X38)
        | X38 = X39 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( empty(esk4_0)
    | intersect(esk6_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X35] : ~ member(X35,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | subset(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk4_0
    | intersect(esk6_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ intersect(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk6_0,esk4_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty(esk4_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X36,X37)
        | ~ intersect(X36,X37) )
      & ( intersect(X36,X37)
        | disjoint(X36,X37) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk3_1(esk4_0),esk6_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ member(esk3_1(esk4_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk3_1(esk4_0),esk5_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_40]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET632+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:31:18 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.28/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.28/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.72  % Total time : 1.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------