↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET632+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:14:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.03s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  108 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  110 (  46   ~;  40   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   74 (   6 sgn  34   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th114,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( disjoint(X2,X3)
        & subset(X1,X3)
        & subset(X1,X2) )
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th114) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersect(X1,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X2)
          & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X2,X1)
        & subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(disjoint_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( disjoint(X2,X3)
          & subset(X1,X3)
          & subset(X1,X2) )
       => X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th114]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( subset(X13,X14)
        | ~ member(esk4_2(X13,X14),X14) )
      & ( subset(X13,X14)
        | member(esk4_2(X13,X14),X13) )
      & ( member(X12,X11)
        | ~ member(X12,X10)
        | ~ subset(X10,X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != empty_set
    & disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & subset(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & subset(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X22,X23,X24] :
      ( ( intersect(X22,X23)
        | ~ member(X24,X23)
        | ~ member(X24,X22) )
      & ( ~ intersect(X19,X20)
        | member(esk5_2(X19,X20),X20) )
      & ( ~ intersect(X19,X20)
        | member(esk5_2(X19,X20),X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | intersect(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk1_0)
    | member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( X16 = X17
        | ~ subset(X17,X16)
        | ~ subset(X16,X17) )
      & ( X16 != X17
        | subset(X17,X16) )
      & ( X16 != X17
        | subset(X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X2,X3),X1)
    | subset(X2,X3)
    | intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X7] : ~ member(X7,empty_set),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,esk1_0)
    | intersect(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X1,X2)
    | member(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | intersect(X1,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X1,X2)
    | member(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X2,esk1_0),X1)
    | ~ intersect(X2,esk1_0)
    | intersect(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | intersect(X2,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( ( disjoint(X8,X9)
        | intersect(X8,X9) )
      & ( ~ intersect(X8,X9)
        | ~ disjoint(X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk5_2(X2,X3),X1)
    | ~ intersect(X2,X3)
    | intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ intersect(X1,esk1_0)
    | intersect(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,X1)
    | empty_set = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X1,X2)
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(X1,X2)
    | intersect(X1,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk1_0)
    | member(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(X1,esk1_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET632+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:33:36 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.03/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.03/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.03/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % new_bool_1 with pid 657036 completed with status 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.03/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.03/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.03/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.03/0.42  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.03/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 657041 completed with status 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.03/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.03/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.03/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.03/0.42  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.03/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.03/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.03/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.03/0.42  
% 0.03/0.42  % Proof found!
% 0.03/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.03/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.03/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.03/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.03/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 18
% 0.03/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 18
% 0.03/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 68
% 0.03/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.03/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 13
% 0.03/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 54
% 0.03/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.03/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.03/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.03/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 104
% 0.03/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 68
% 0.03/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.03/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 100
% 0.03/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.03/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 32
% 0.03/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 24
% 0.03/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.03/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.03/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.03/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.03/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.03/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 44
% 0.03/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.03/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.03/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.03/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 31
% 0.03/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.03/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 40
% 0.03/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.03/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 148
% 0.03/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 137
% 0.03/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 12
% 0.03/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.03/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.03/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.03/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.03/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1873
% 0.03/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 265
% 0.03/0.42  
% 0.03/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.03/0.42  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.03/0.42  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.03/0.42  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.03/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 3584 pages
% 0.03/0.42  
% 0.03/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.03/0.42  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.03/0.42  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.03/0.42  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.03/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.03/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------