↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET632+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:41 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.03s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  105 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  106 (  44   ~;  33   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   3 sgn  38   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,C)
          & member(D,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [B] : ~ member(B,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(disjoint_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( disjoint(B,C)
    <=> ~ intersect(B,C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( B = C
    <=> ( subset(C,B)
        & subset(B,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(empty_defn,axiom,
    ! [B] :
      ( empty(B)
    <=> ! [C] : ~ member(C,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_defn) ).

fof(prove_th114,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( disjoint(C,D)
        & subset(B,D)
        & subset(B,C) )
     => B = empty_set ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th114) ).

fof(prove_th114_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D] :
        ( ( disjoint(C,D)
          & subset(B,D)
          & subset(B,C) )
       => B = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th114]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( ~ intersect(A,B)
    | ~ disjoint(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[disjoint_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ? [B,C,D] :
      ( empty_set != B
      & disjoint(C,D)
      & subset(B,D)
      & subset(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th114_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th114_neg,plain,
    ( empty_set != sK4
    & disjoint(sK0,sK1)
    & subset(sK4,sK1)
    & subset(sK4,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK4),skolemize(C,sK0),skolemize(D,sK1)],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th114_neg]) ).

fof(nnf_8,plain,
    ! [B] :
      ( ( ? [C] : member(C,B)
        | empty(B) )
      & ( ! [X0] : ~ member(X0,B)
        | ~ empty(B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[empty_defn]) ).

fof(sk_empty_defn_sk,plain,
    ! [B] :
      ( ( member(sK2(B),B)
        | empty(B) )
      & ( ! [X0] : ~ member(X0,B)
        | ~ empty(B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(C,sK2(B))],[nnf_8]) ).

fof(sk_empty_defn,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0] :
        ( member(sK2(VAR_0),VAR_0)
        | empty(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ empty(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_empty_defn_sk]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(B,A)
    | ~ empty(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_empty_defn]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( member(sK2(A),A)
    | empty(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_empty_defn]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( member(sK2(B),B)
    | ~ member(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_14]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ~ member(D,C)
            & member(D,B) )
        | subset(B,C) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,C)
            | ~ member(X0,B) )
        | ~ subset(B,C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn]) ).

fof(sk_subset_defn_sk,plain,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK3(B,C),C)
          & member(sK3(B,C),B) )
        | subset(B,C) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,C)
            | ~ member(X0,B) )
        | ~ subset(B,C) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(D,sK3(B,C))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subset_defn,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn_sk]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( member(sK3(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_defn]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | intersect(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ~ member(A,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ subset(B,A)
    | A = B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equal_defn]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK4,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th114_neg]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK4,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th114_neg]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK4,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th114_neg]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    sK4 != empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

cnf(c_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    ( member(sK3(B,A),B)
    | ~ subset(A,B)
    | A = B ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    ( member(A,sK0)
    | ~ member(A,sK4) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    ( member(A,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,sK4) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(sK3(empty_set,sK4),empty_set)
    | ~ subset(sK4,empty_set) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK4,empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    member(sK3(sK4,empty_set),sK4),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_47,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    member(sK2(sK4),sK4),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    member(sK2(sK4),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    member(sK2(sK4),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(A,sK1)
    | ~ member(A,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK2(sK4),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_70]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET632+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.50  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.50  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.50  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.50  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.50  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.50  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.50  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.50  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:01:36 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.50  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.50  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/0.50  % Process 81319 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.03/0.50  % Sat Sep 26 08:01:36 2026
% 0.03/0.50  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/0.51  
% 0.03/0.51  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.03/0.52  
% 0.03/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.03/0.52  
% 0.03/0.52  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.03/0.52  % Length of proof is 31.
% 0.03/0.52  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.03/0.52  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.03/0.52  % Given clauses 32.
% 0.03/0.52  
% 0.03/0.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------