↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET633^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.29s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  269 (  95 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  324 (  71   ~;  60   |;  45   &; 126   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   0 sgn  40   !;  12   ?;  52   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
              & ( X0 @ X3 ) )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              & ~ ( X0 @ X3 ) )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
     => ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              & ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
            | ( ~ ( X0 @ X3 )
              & ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
         => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_115_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ( X0 @ X3 ) )
             => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ~ ( X0 @ X3 ) )
             => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) )
       => ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                & ~ ( X1 @ X3 ) )
              | ( ~ ( X0 @ X3 )
                & ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X0 @ X3 )
                & ( X2 @ X3 ) )
             => ( X1 @ X3 ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                & ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) )
             => ( X1 @ X4 ) ) )
       => ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( ( X2 @ X5 )
                & ~ ( X0 @ X5 ) )
              | ( ~ ( X2 @ X5 )
                & ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )
           => ( X1 @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                 != $true )
                & ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                  = $true ) )
             => ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                  = $true )
                & ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                 != $true ) )
             => ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                = $true ) ) )
       => ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( ( $true
                  = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                 != $true ) )
              | ( ( $true
                 != ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                  = $true ) ) )
           => ( $true
              = ( X1 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ! [X4: a] :
              ( ( ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                 != $true )
                & ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                  = $true ) )
             => ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                = $true ) )
          & ! [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                 != $true )
                & ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                  = $true ) )
             => ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true ) ) )
       => ! [X5: a] :
            ( ( ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                  = $true )
                & ( $true
                 != ( X2 @ X5 ) ) )
              | ( ( $true
                  = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
                & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                 != $true ) ) )
           => ( $true
              = ( X1 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X1 @ X5 ) )
          & ( ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                = $true )
              & ( $true
               != ( X2 @ X5 ) ) )
            | ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
              & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
               != $true ) ) ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X3 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X3 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X1 @ X5 ) )
          & ( ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                = $true )
              & ( $true
               != ( X2 @ X5 ) ) )
            | ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
              & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
               != $true ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X2 @ X3 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true ) )
      & ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
            = $true ) )
      & ? [X5: a] :
          ( ( $true
           != ( X1 @ X5 ) )
          & ( ( ( $true
                = ( X2 @ X5 ) )
              & ( ( X0 @ X5 )
               != $true ) )
            | ( ( ( X0 @ X5 )
                = $true )
              & ( $true
               != ( X2 @ X5 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK2 @ X3 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( sK0 @ X3 ) )
        | ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
          = $true ) )
    & ! [X4: a] :
        ( ( ( sK1 @ X4 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK0 @ X4 ) )
        | ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
          = $true ) )
    & ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
     != $true )
    & ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
         != $true ) )
      | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
         != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X5,sK3)],[f8]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
     != $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X4: a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK0 @ X4 ) )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X4 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X4 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK2 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f20,definition,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
     != $true )
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f24,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
     != $true )
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f24,f20]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f24,f20]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f15,f25]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f30,f14]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f31,f22]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f16,f21]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f35,f26]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f36,f14]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f37]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f27]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f28]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f33]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f38]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s3]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    spl4_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s5]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s6,s5]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET633^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:40:16 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.29  % (107247)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=209878418:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-107247-107266"...
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)...printing done.
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.23/0.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.29  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.23/0.29  % (107266)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.23/0.29  % (107247)Success in time 0.039 s
% 0.23/0.29  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------