↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET633+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_15)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th115,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
        & subset(difference(X2,X1),X3) )
     => subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th115) ).

fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_symmetric_difference,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_symmetric_difference) ).

fof(difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',difference_defn) ).

fof(equal_member_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
        <=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_member_defn) ).

fof(union_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X3,X2) )
     => subset(union(X1,X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_subset) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(reflexivity_of_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_of_subset) ).

fof(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
          & subset(difference(X2,X1),X3) )
       => subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th115]) ).

fof(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0)
    & subset(difference(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk5_0)
    & ~ subset(symmetric_difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_9])])]) ).

fof(i_0_11,plain,
    ! [X26,X27] : symmetric_difference(X26,X27) = union(difference(X26,X27),difference(X27,X26)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

fof(i_0_12,plain,
    ! [X42,X43] : symmetric_difference(X42,X43) = symmetric_difference(X43,X42),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_symmetric_difference]) ).

fof(i_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,difference(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & ~ member(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference_defn]) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(symmetric_difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_10]) ).

cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_11]) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = symmetric_difference(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_12]) ).

fof(i_0_17,plain,
    ! [X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49] :
      ( ( ~ member(X46,X44)
        | member(X46,X45)
        | X44 != X45 )
      & ( ~ member(X47,X45)
        | member(X47,X44)
        | X44 != X45 )
      & ( ~ member(esk2_2(X48,X49),X48)
        | ~ member(esk2_2(X48,X49),X49)
        | X48 = X49 )
      & ( member(esk2_2(X48,X49),X48)
        | member(esk2_2(X48,X49),X49)
        | X48 = X49 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_member_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(i_0_18,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ( member(X33,X31)
        | ~ member(X33,difference(X31,X32)) )
      & ( ~ member(X33,X32)
        | ~ member(X33,difference(X31,X32)) )
      & ( ~ member(X33,X31)
        | member(X33,X32)
        | member(X33,difference(X31,X32)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_13])])]) ).

fof(i_0_19,plain,
    ! [X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ~ subset(X28,X29)
      | ~ subset(X30,X29)
      | subset(union(X28,X30),X29) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_subset])]) ).

fof(i_0_20,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36,X37,X38] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X34,X35)
        | ~ member(X36,X34)
        | member(X36,X35) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X37,X38),X37)
        | subset(X37,X38) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X37,X38),X38)
        | subset(X37,X38) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(i_0_21,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] : union(X40,X41) = union(X41,X40),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

fof(i_0_22,plain,
    ! [X51] : subset(X51,X51),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_of_subset]) ).

cnf(i_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[i_0_14,c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)) = union(difference(X2,X1),difference(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[i_0_16,c_0_15]),c_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_17]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_18]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X3),X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_19]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    ( member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_17]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_20]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_18]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | member(X1,difference(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_18]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_20]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_20]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_10]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_10]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_21]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_22]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_38,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_39,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_40,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | union(X1,X3) = union(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_42,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | union(X3,X1) = union(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | member(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_46,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X3,X1)
    | member(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_38_001,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_39_002,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_40_003,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_41_004,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | union(X1,X3) = union(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_42_005,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | union(X3,X1) = union(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_43_006,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_44_007,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_45_008,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | member(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_46_009,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ member(X3,X1)
    | member(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    $false,
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_23,i_0_35,i_0_34,i_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET633+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:31:21 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.26/1.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.26/1.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/1.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.62  % Total time : 1.271s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------