%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET633+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:14:49 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th115,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(difference(X2,X1),X3)
& subset(difference(X1,X2),X3) )
=> subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th115) ).
fof(union_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X3,X2)
& subset(X1,X2) )
=> subset(union(X1,X3),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_subset) ).
fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(difference(X2,X1),X3)
& subset(difference(X1,X2),X3) )
=> subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th115]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( subset(union(X7,X9),X8)
| ~ subset(X9,X8)
| ~ subset(X7,X8) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_subset])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X17,X18] : symmetric_difference(X17,X18) = union(difference(X17,X18),difference(X18,X17)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(symmetric_difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
& subset(difference(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0)
& subset(difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ subset(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| subset(union(X1,X3),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
symmetric_difference(X1,X2) = union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(symmetric_difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ subset(difference(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ subset(difference(X2,X1),X3)
| subset(symmetric_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
subset(difference(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
subset(difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET633+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:30:21 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % sh5l with pid 3230827 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/0.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3230828 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.13/0.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.13/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses : 18
% 0.13/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.13/0.44 % Processed clauses : 47
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.13/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.13/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Generated clauses : 93
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 74
% 0.13/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Paramodulations : 91
% 0.13/0.44 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.13/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.13/0.44 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 38
% 0.13/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.13/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.13/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 28
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42
% 0.13/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 125
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 99
% 0.13/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 95
% 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7
% 0.13/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.13/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.13/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2338
% 0.13/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 282
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.13/0.44
% 0.13/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------