%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SET633+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:01:35 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SET633+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 21:56:59 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.14/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.14/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.14/0.37 # % 0.14/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.14/0.37 # Number of axioms: 15 Number of unprocessed: 14 % 0.14/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.14/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.14/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.14/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.14/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.14/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.14/0.37 # 14 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.14/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures. % 0.14/0.37 # There are 3 start rule candidates: % 0.14/0.37 # Found 5 unit axioms. % 0.14/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.14/0.37 # 3 start rule tableaux created. % 0.14/0.37 # 9 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.14/0.37 # 5 unit axiom clauses % 0.14/0.37 % 0.14/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.14/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3 % 0.14/0.37 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 2 closures done. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.14/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.14/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.14/0.37 % 0.14/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.14/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (subset(X1,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (subset(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (subset(difference(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk5_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (union(X1,X2)=union(X2,X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~subset(union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),esk5_0))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~member(X1,difference(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,difference(X2,X3)))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X3)|~subset(X3,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=X2|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|subset(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (subset(union(X1,X2),X3)|~subset(X2,X3)|~subset(X1,X3))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (member(X1,difference(X2,X3))|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,X2))). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.14/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.14/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.14/0.37 # Found 4 steps % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~subset(union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),esk5_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~subset(union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),esk5_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~subset(difference(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk5_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])). % 0.14/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~subset(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])). % 0.14/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.14/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.14/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.14/0.37 # Returning from population with 5 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.14/0.37 # We now have 5 tableaux to operate on % 0.14/0.37 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.14/0.37 # Proof search is over... % 0.14/0.37 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------