↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET633+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:41 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.02s 0.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (   9   ~;   3   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  11   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',symmetric_difference_defn) ).

fof(union_subset,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( subset(D,C)
        & subset(B,C) )
     => subset(union(B,D),C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',union_subset) ).

fof(prove_th115,conjecture,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( ( subset(difference(C,B),D)
        & subset(difference(B,C),D) )
     => subset(symmetric_difference(B,C),D) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th115) ).

fof(prove_th115_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C,D] :
        ( ( subset(difference(C,B),D)
          & subset(difference(B,C),D) )
       => subset(symmetric_difference(B,C),D) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th115]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    union(difference(A,B),difference(B,A)) = symmetric_difference(A,B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    symmetric_difference(A,B) = union(difference(A,B),difference(B,A)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_10]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( subset(union(A,C),B)
    | ~ subset(C,B)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[union_subset]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ? [B,C,D] :
      ( ~ subset(symmetric_difference(B,C),D)
      & subset(difference(C,B),D)
      & subset(difference(B,C),D) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th115_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th115_neg,plain,
    ( ~ subset(symmetric_difference(sK0,sK1),sK2)
    & subset(difference(sK1,sK0),sK2)
    & subset(difference(sK0,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1),skolemize(D,sK2)],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_26,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th115_neg]) ).

cnf(c_27,negated_conjecture,
    subset(difference(sK1,sK0),sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th115_neg]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(symmetric_difference(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th115_neg]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(union(difference(sK0,sK1),difference(sK1,sK0)),sK2),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(union(A,difference(sK1,sK0)),sK2)
    | ~ subset(A,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(difference(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_64]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET633+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.02/0.30  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:01:35 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.02/0.30  % Process 81255 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.02/0.30  % Sat Sep 26 08:01:35 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.02/0.32  
% 0.02/0.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.02/0.32  
% 0.02/0.32  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.02/0.32  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.02/0.32  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.02/0.32  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.02/0.32  % Given clauses 17.
% 0.02/0.32  
% 0.02/0.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------