↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SET636+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:01:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SET636+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 04:14:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.38  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.38  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.38  #
% 0.19/0.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.38  # Number of axioms: 24 Number of unprocessed: 22
% 0.19/0.38  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.38  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.38  # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.42  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.42  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.42  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.42  # 22 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.42  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.42  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.42  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.42  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.42  # 19 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.42  # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.42  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.43  # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.43  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.43  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.43  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.43  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (subset(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (intersection(X1,X2)=intersection(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (~member(X1,empty_set))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0)!=empty_set|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0)=empty_set|disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~disjoint(X1,X2)|~intersect(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~empty(X1)|~member(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (intersect(X1,X2)|~intersect(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X1=X2|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,intersection(X3,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (disjoint(X1,X2)|intersect(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (empty(X1)|member(esk3_1(X1),X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)|~intersect(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~subset(X3,X2)|~member(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (intersect(X1,X2)|~member(X3,X2)|~member(X3,X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|~intersect(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (X1=X2|~member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)|~member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (X1=X2|member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.19/0.43  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.43  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.43  # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0)!=empty_set|~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~disjoint(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_177, plain, (intersect(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (intersection(esk5_0,esk6_0)!=empty_set), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_31, ...])).
% 0.19/0.43  cnf(i_0_213, plain, (intersect(esk6_0,esk5_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_213, ...])).
% 0.19/0.43  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.43  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.43  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.43  # Returning from population with 5 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.43  # We now have 5 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.43  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.19/0.43  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.43  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------