↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   9   ~;   1   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn   8   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
     => intersection(B,C) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset_intersection) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : intersection(B,C) = intersection(C,B),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(prove_th121,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( ( intersection(C,B) = empty_set
        & subset(B,C) )
     => B = empty_set ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_th121) ).

fof(prove_th121_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( ( intersection(C,B) = empty_set
          & subset(B,C) )
       => B = empty_set ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th121]) ).

fof(nnf_10,plain,
    ? [B,C] :
      ( empty_set != B
      & intersection(C,B) = empty_set
      & subset(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_th121_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_th121_neg,plain,
    ( empty_set != sK0
    & intersection(sK1,sK0) = empty_set
    & subset(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1)],[nnf_10]) ).

cnf(c_14,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th121_neg]) ).

cnf(c_15,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_14]) ).

cnf(c_16,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(sK1,sK0) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th121_neg]) ).

cnf(c_17,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set = intersection(sK1,sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_16]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_th121_neg]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    intersection(A,B) = intersection(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    ( intersection(A,B) = A
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subset_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != intersection(sK1,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != intersection(sK0,sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_77]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(sK0,sK1) != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).

cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(sK0,sK1) = sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_79]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET639+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:07:57 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.38  % Process 1328549 was started by sandbox on n001,
% 0.09/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 08:07:57 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.40  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.09/0.40  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.09/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.09/0.40  % Given clauses 19.
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------