%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SET643+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:25:49 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 42.75s 6.63s % Output : Proof 44.75s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SET643+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0. % 0.00/0.14 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 10:32:47 EDT 2023 % 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.63 ________ _____ % 0.21/0.63 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.21/0.63 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.21/0.63 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.21/0.63 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.21/0.63 % 0.21/0.63 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.21/0.63 (2023-06-19) % 0.21/0.63 % 0.21/0.63 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.21/0.63 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.21/0.63 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.21/0.63 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.21/0.63 % 0.21/0.63 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.21/0.63 % 0.21/0.63 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.21/0.64 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.21/0.66 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.21/0.66 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.21/0.66 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.21/0.66 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.21/0.66 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.21/0.66 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.21/0.66 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.83/1.15 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.15 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.19 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.19 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.19 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.19 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.19 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 6.86/1.76 Prover 2: Proving ... % 7.30/1.79 Prover 5: Proving ... % 7.30/1.79 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.30/1.80 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.91/1.90 Prover 6: Proving ... % 10.78/2.30 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.83/2.43 Prover 0: Proving ... % 42.75/6.62 Prover 2: proved (5963ms) % 42.75/6.63 % 42.75/6.63 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 42.75/6.63 % 42.75/6.63 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 42.75/6.63 Prover 6: stopped % 42.75/6.63 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 42.75/6.63 Prover 0: stopped % 43.49/6.64 Prover 3: stopped % 43.49/6.65 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 43.49/6.65 Prover 5: stopped % 43.49/6.65 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 43.49/6.65 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 43.49/6.69 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 43.90/6.69 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 43.90/6.70 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 43.90/6.72 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 43.90/6.73 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 43.90/6.74 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 43.90/6.74 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 44.41/6.76 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 44.41/6.77 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 44.41/6.79 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 44.41/6.79 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 44.75/6.81 Prover 10: Found proof (size 23) % 44.75/6.81 Prover 10: proved (166ms) % 44.75/6.81 Prover 7: stopped % 44.75/6.81 Prover 8: stopped % 44.75/6.81 Prover 4: stopped % 44.75/6.82 Prover 1: stopped % 44.75/6.82 Prover 11: stopped % 44.75/6.83 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 44.75/6.84 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 44.75/6.84 Prover 13: stopped % 44.75/6.84 % 44.75/6.84 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 44.75/6.84 % 44.75/6.85 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 44.75/6.85 Assumptions after simplification: % 44.75/6.85 --------------------------------- % 44.75/6.85 % 44.75/6.85 (p1) % 44.75/6.88 $i(set_type) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ % 44.75/6.88 (relation_type(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 44.75/6.88 ilf_type(v2, set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v1, set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v0, % 44.75/6.88 set_type) | ilf_type(v0, v3) | ? [v4: $i] : (cross_product(v1, v2) = v4 & % 44.75/6.88 $i(v4) & ~ subset(v0, v4))) % 44.75/6.88 % 44.75/6.88 (p3) % 44.75/6.88 $i(set_type) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ % 44.75/6.88 (cross_product(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ilf_type(v1, % 44.75/6.88 set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v0, set_type) | ilf_type(v2, set_type)) % 44.75/6.88 % 44.75/6.88 (p4) % 44.75/6.88 $i(set_type) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ % 44.75/6.88 (relation_type(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ilf_type(v1, % 44.75/6.88 set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v0, set_type) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : % 44.75/6.88 (subset_type(v3) = v4 & cross_product(v0, v1) = v3 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & ! % 44.75/6.88 [v5: $i] : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ ilf_type(v5, v4) | ilf_type(v5, v2)) & ! [v5: % 44.75/6.88 $i] : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ ilf_type(v5, v2) | ilf_type(v5, v4)))) % 44.75/6.88 % 44.75/6.88 (p9) % 44.75/6.88 $i(set_type) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ % 44.75/6.88 $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(v2, v0) | ~ subset(v0, v1) | ~ ilf_type(v2, % 44.75/6.88 set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v1, set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v0, set_type) | % 44.75/6.88 member(v2, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 44.75/6.88 ilf_type(v1, set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v0, set_type) | subset(v0, v1) | ? % 44.75/6.88 [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & member(v2, v0) & ilf_type(v2, set_type) & ~ member(v2, % 44.75/6.88 v1))) % 44.75/6.88 % 44.75/6.88 (prove_relset_1_5) % 44.75/6.88 $i(set_type) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : % 44.75/6.88 (relation_type(v0, v1) = v3 & cross_product(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & % 44.75/6.88 $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ilf_type(v1, set_type) & ilf_type(v0, set_type) & ~ % 44.75/6.88 ilf_type(v2, v3)) % 44.75/6.88 % 44.75/6.88 (function-axioms) % 44.75/6.89 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 44.75/6.89 (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] % 44.75/6.89 : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (relation_type(v3, % 44.75/6.89 v2) = v1) | ~ (relation_type(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] % 44.75/6.89 : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (cross_product(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ % 44.75/6.89 (cross_product(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : % 44.75/6.89 (v1 = v0 | ~ (power_set(v2) = v1) | ~ (power_set(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : % 44.75/6.89 ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (member_type(v2) = v1) | ~ % 44.75/6.89 (member_type(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 % 44.75/6.89 | ~ (subset_type(v2) = v1) | ~ (subset_type(v2) = v0)) % 44.75/6.89 % 44.75/6.89 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 44.75/6.89 -------------------------------------------- % 44.75/6.89 p10, p11, p12, p13, p14, p15, p16, p17, p18, p19, p2, p5, p6, p7, p8 % 44.75/6.89 % 44.75/6.89 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 44.75/6.89 --------------------------------- % 44.75/6.89 % 44.75/6.89 Begin of proof % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | ALPHA: (p1) implies: % 44.75/6.89 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ % 44.75/6.89 | (relation_type(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 44.75/6.89 | ilf_type(v2, set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v1, set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v0, % 44.75/6.89 | set_type) | ilf_type(v0, v3) | ? [v4: $i] : (cross_product(v1, v2) % 44.75/6.89 | = v4 & $i(v4) & ~ subset(v0, v4))) % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | ALPHA: (p3) implies: % 44.75/6.89 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (cross_product(v0, v1) = % 44.75/6.89 | v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ilf_type(v1, set_type) | ~ % 44.75/6.89 | ilf_type(v0, set_type) | ilf_type(v2, set_type)) % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | ALPHA: (p4) implies: % 44.75/6.89 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_type(v0, v1) = % 44.75/6.89 | v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ilf_type(v1, set_type) | ~ % 44.75/6.89 | ilf_type(v0, set_type) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : (subset_type(v3) % 44.75/6.89 | = v4 & cross_product(v0, v1) = v3 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & ! [v5: $i] : % 44.75/6.89 | ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ ilf_type(v5, v4) | ilf_type(v5, v2)) & ! [v5: $i] % 44.75/6.89 | : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ ilf_type(v5, v2) | ilf_type(v5, v4)))) % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | ALPHA: (p9) implies: % 44.75/6.89 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ilf_type(v1, % 44.75/6.89 | set_type) | ~ ilf_type(v0, set_type) | subset(v0, v1) | ? [v2: % 44.75/6.89 | $i] : ($i(v2) & member(v2, v0) & ilf_type(v2, set_type) & ~ % 44.75/6.89 | member(v2, v1))) % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | ALPHA: (prove_relset_1_5) implies: % 44.75/6.89 | (5) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : % 44.75/6.89 | (relation_type(v0, v1) = v3 & cross_product(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v3) & % 44.75/6.89 | $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ilf_type(v1, set_type) & ilf_type(v0, % 44.75/6.89 | set_type) & ~ ilf_type(v2, v3)) % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies: % 44.75/6.89 | (6) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 44.75/6.89 | (cross_product(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (cross_product(v3, v2) = v0)) % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | DELTA: instantiating (5) with fresh symbols all_23_0, all_23_1, all_23_2, % 44.75/6.89 | all_23_3 gives: % 44.75/6.89 | (7) relation_type(all_23_3, all_23_2) = all_23_0 & cross_product(all_23_3, % 44.75/6.89 | all_23_2) = all_23_1 & $i(all_23_0) & $i(all_23_1) & $i(all_23_2) & % 44.75/6.89 | $i(all_23_3) & ilf_type(all_23_2, set_type) & ilf_type(all_23_3, % 44.75/6.89 | set_type) & ~ ilf_type(all_23_1, all_23_0) % 44.75/6.89 | % 44.75/6.89 | ALPHA: (7) implies: % 44.75/6.90 | (8) ~ ilf_type(all_23_1, all_23_0) % 44.75/6.90 | (9) ilf_type(all_23_3, set_type) % 44.75/6.90 | (10) ilf_type(all_23_2, set_type) % 44.75/6.90 | (11) $i(all_23_3) % 44.75/6.90 | (12) $i(all_23_2) % 44.75/6.90 | (13) cross_product(all_23_3, all_23_2) = all_23_1 % 44.75/6.90 | (14) relation_type(all_23_3, all_23_2) = all_23_0 % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_23_3, all_23_2, all_23_1, simplifying % 44.75/6.90 | with (9), (10), (11), (12), (13) gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (15) ilf_type(all_23_1, set_type) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_23_3, all_23_2, all_23_0, simplifying % 44.75/6.90 | with (9), (10), (11), (12), (14) gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (16) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : (subset_type(v0) = v1 & % 44.75/6.90 | cross_product(all_23_3, all_23_2) = v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ! [v2: % 44.75/6.90 | $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ ilf_type(v2, v1) | ilf_type(v2, all_23_0)) & % 44.75/6.90 | ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ ilf_type(v2, all_23_0) | ilf_type(v2, % 44.75/6.90 | v1))) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | DELTA: instantiating (16) with fresh symbols all_36_0, all_36_1 gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (17) subset_type(all_36_1) = all_36_0 & cross_product(all_23_3, all_23_2) = % 44.75/6.90 | all_36_1 & $i(all_36_0) & $i(all_36_1) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 44.75/6.90 | ilf_type(v0, all_36_0) | ilf_type(v0, all_23_0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ % 44.75/6.90 | $i(v0) | ~ ilf_type(v0, all_23_0) | ilf_type(v0, all_36_0)) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | ALPHA: (17) implies: % 44.75/6.90 | (18) $i(all_36_1) % 44.75/6.90 | (19) cross_product(all_23_3, all_23_2) = all_36_1 % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_23_1, all_36_1, all_23_2, all_23_3, % 44.75/6.90 | simplifying with (13), (19) gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (20) all_36_1 = all_23_1 % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | REDUCE: (18), (20) imply: % 44.75/6.90 | (21) $i(all_23_1) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_23_1, all_23_3, all_23_2, all_23_0, % 44.75/6.90 | simplifying with (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (14), (15), (21) % 44.75/6.90 | gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (22) ? [v0: $i] : (cross_product(all_23_3, all_23_2) = v0 & $i(v0) & ~ % 44.75/6.90 | subset(all_23_1, v0)) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_23_1, all_23_1, simplifying with (15), % 44.75/6.90 | (21) gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (23) subset(all_23_1, all_23_1) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | DELTA: instantiating (22) with fresh symbol all_55_0 gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (24) cross_product(all_23_3, all_23_2) = all_55_0 & $i(all_55_0) & ~ % 44.75/6.90 | subset(all_23_1, all_55_0) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | ALPHA: (24) implies: % 44.75/6.90 | (25) ~ subset(all_23_1, all_55_0) % 44.75/6.90 | (26) cross_product(all_23_3, all_23_2) = all_55_0 % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_23_1, all_55_0, all_23_2, all_23_3, % 44.75/6.90 | simplifying with (13), (26) gives: % 44.75/6.90 | (27) all_55_0 = all_23_1 % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | REDUCE: (25), (27) imply: % 44.75/6.90 | (28) ~ subset(all_23_1, all_23_1) % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | PRED_UNIFY: (23), (28) imply: % 44.75/6.90 | (29) $false % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 | CLOSE: (29) is inconsistent. % 44.75/6.90 | % 44.75/6.90 End of proof % 44.75/6.91 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 44.75/6.91 % 44.75/6.91 6272ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------