↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNK-Non.f

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET644+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:19:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.43s 1.70s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET644+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 20:42:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37  Sun Jul 10 20:42:47 2022
% 0.12/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1621.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 147 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c5,set_type).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 147 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c4,set_type).
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 147 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c3,set_type).
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 114.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 113.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 108.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 100.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 92.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 91.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 86.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 56.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 51.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 48.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 47.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 43.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 39.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 34.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 30.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 21.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 20.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 19.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 12.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 2.
% 0.12/0.37  147 back subsumes 1.
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 150 during input processing: 0 [copy,150,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37  150 back subsumes 102.
% 0.12/0.37  150 back subsumes 101.
% 0.12/0.37  150 back subsumes 93.
% 0.12/0.37  150 back subsumes 90.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 115
% 0.12/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 120
% 0.12/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 95
% 0.12/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.12/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.12/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 33
% 0.12/0.41     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.12/0.41     distinct function count: 20
% 0.12/0.41     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Model 2 [ 3 1 207 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Model 3 [ 2 1 1112 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Model 4 [ 2 1 3409 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Model 5 [ 2 0 1363 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.43/1.69  ilf_type(A,set_type).
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  ------------- memory usage ------------
% 1.43/1.69  16 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 510.9 K.
% 1.43/1.69    type (bytes each)        gets      frees     in use      avail      bytes
% 1.43/1.69  sym_ent ( 304)              145          0        145          0     43.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  term (  32)               20764      18969       1795         14     56.5 K
% 1.43/1.69  rel (  40)                16239      13844       2395         13     94.1 K
% 1.43/1.69  term_ptr (  16)            8688       3340       5348        433     90.3 K
% 1.43/1.69  formula_ptr_2 (  56)          0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  fpa_head (  24)             845        160        685         42     17.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  fpa_tree (  56)            2095       2095          0         20      1.1 K
% 1.43/1.69  context (1288)             3434       3434          0          8     10.1 K
% 1.43/1.69  trail (  24)             113965     113965          0          8      0.2 K
% 1.43/1.69  imd_tree (  32)              10          3          7          3      0.3 K
% 1.43/1.69  imd_pos (4024)              100        100          0          3     11.8 K
% 1.43/1.69  is_tree (  24)              917        358        559        156     16.8 K
% 1.43/1.69  is_pos (2424)             15671      15671          0          5     11.8 K
% 1.43/1.69  fsub_pos (  16)            1938       1938          0          1      0.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  literal (  32)             3193       2120       1073          2     33.6 K
% 1.43/1.69  clause (  88)               795        468        327          1     28.2 K
% 1.43/1.69  list ( 272)                  39         32          7          2      2.4 K
% 1.43/1.69  clash_nd (  80)             783        783          0          5      0.4 K
% 1.43/1.69  clause_ptr (  16)           385        103        282         16      4.7 K
% 1.43/1.69  int_ptr (  16)             2638        866       1772          4     27.8 K
% 1.43/1.69  ci_ptr (  24)                 0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  link_node ( 120)              0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  ans_lit_node(  24)            0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  formula_box( 168)             0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  formula(  40)               745        745          0        296     11.6 K
% 1.43/1.69  formula_ptr(  16)            29         29          0         29      0.5 K
% 1.43/1.69  cl_attribute(  24)            0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  ********** is_delete, can't find term.
% 1.43/1.69  tor simplify      0.00
% 1.43/1.69    weigh cl time        0.00
% 1.43/1.69    hints keep time      0.00
% 1.43/1.69    sort lits time       0.00
% 1.43/1.69    forward subsume      0.00
% 1.43/1.69    delete cl time       0.00
% 1.43/1.69    keep cl time         0.00
% 1.43/1.69      hints time         0.00
% 1.43/1.69    print_cl time        0.00
% 1.43/1.69    conflict time        0.00
% 1.43/1.69    new demod time       0.00
% 1.43/1.69  post_process time      0.00
% 1.43/1.69    back demod time      0.00
% 1.43/1.69    back subsume         0.00
% 1.43/1.69    factor time          0.00
% 1.43/1.69  FINDER time            0.00
% 1.43/1.69    unindex time         0.00
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  true clauses given           3      (33.3%)
% 1.43/1.69  false clauses given          6
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.43/1.69     4  0         1
% 1.43/1.69     5  1         0
% 1.43/1.69     6  4         2
% 1.43/1.69     7  3         1
% 1.43/1.69     8  3         0
% 1.43/1.69     9  6         0
% 1.43/1.69    11  3         0
% 1.43/1.69    12  3         2
% 1.43/1.69    13  11        9
% 1.43/1.69    15  10        5
% 1.43/1.69    16  1         1
% 1.43/1.69    17  1         1
% 1.43/1.69    18  0         1
% 1.43/1.69    19  0         1
% 1.43/1.69  tot:  46        24      (34.3% true)
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Model 5 [ 2 -3 1363 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 1.43/1.69   1:0     2:0     3:0     4:0     5:0     6:0     7:0     8:0     9:0    10:0   
% 1.43/1.69  11:0    12:0    13:0    14:0    15:0    16:0    17:0    18:0    19:0    20:0   
% 1.43/1.69  21:0    22:0    23:0    24:0    25:0    26:0    27:0    28:0    29:0    30:0   
% 1.43/1.69  31:0    32:0    33:0    34:0    35:0    36:0    37:5    38:0    39:0    40:0   
% 1.43/1.69  41:0    42:0    43:0    44:0    45:0    46:0    47:0    48:0    49:0    50:0   
% 1.43/1.69  51:0    52:0    53:0    54:0    55:0    56:0    57:0    58:0    59:0    60:0   
% 1.43/1.69  61:0    62:0    63:0    64:0    65:0    66:0    67:0    68:0    69:0    70:0   
% 1.43/1.69  71:0    72:0    73:0    74:0    75:0    76:0    77:0    78:0    79:4    80:0   
% 1.43/1.69  81:0    82:0    83:0    84:0    85:0    86:0    87:0    88:0    89:0    90:1   
% 1.43/1.69  91:0    92:0    93:0    94:0    95:0    96:0    97:0    98:0    99:0    
% 1.43/1.69  All others: 138.
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 1.43/1.69  
% 1.43/1.69  ********** is_delete, can't find term.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------