↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET658+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.03s 5.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  12   ~;   7   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   1 sgn   6   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [B] :
      ( ilf_type(B,set_type)
     => ! [C] :
          ( ilf_type(C,binary_relation_type)
         => ( subset(domain_of(C),B)
           => ilf_type(C,relation_type(B,range_of(C))) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

fof(p15,axiom,
    ! [B] :
      ( ilf_type(B,set_type)
     => subset(B,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',p15) ).

fof(p28,axiom,
    ! [B] : ilf_type(B,set_type),
    file('theBenchmark.p',p28) ).

fof(prove_relset_1_20,conjecture,
    ! [B] :
      ( ilf_type(B,binary_relation_type)
     => ilf_type(B,relation_type(domain_of(B),range_of(B))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_20) ).

fof(prove_relset_1_20_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B] :
        ( ilf_type(B,binary_relation_type)
       => ilf_type(B,relation_type(domain_of(B),range_of(B))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_relset_1_20]) ).

fof(nnf_29,plain,
    ? [B] :
      ( ~ ilf_type(B,relation_type(domain_of(B),range_of(B)))
      & ilf_type(B,binary_relation_type) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_relset_1_20_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_relset_1_20_neg,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(sK0,relation_type(domain_of(sK0),range_of(sK0)))
    & ilf_type(sK0,binary_relation_type) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_29]) ).

cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ilf_type(sK0,relation_type(domain_of(sK0),range_of(sK0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_relset_1_20_neg]) ).

cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type(sK0,binary_relation_type),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_relset_1_20_neg]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ilf_type(A,set_type),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[p28]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    ( subset(A,A)
    | ~ ilf_type(A,set_type) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[p15]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    subset(A,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_88]) ).

cnf(c_122,plain,
    ( ilf_type(B,relation_type(A,range_of(B)))
    | ~ subset(domain_of(B),A)
    | ~ ilf_type(B,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(A,set_type) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[p1]) ).

cnf(c_123,plain,
    ( ilf_type(A,relation_type(B,range_of(A)))
    | ~ subset(domain_of(A),B)
    | ~ ilf_type(A,binary_relation_type) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_122]) ).

cnf(c_180,plain,
    ( ilf_type(A,relation_type(domain_of(A),range_of(A)))
    | ~ ilf_type(A,binary_relation_type) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_181,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ilf_type(sK0,binary_relation_type),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_180,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_179,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_181]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET658+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/5.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/5.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/5.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/5.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/5.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/5.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/5.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/5.31  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:03:11 UTC 2026
% 0.03/5.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/5.31  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/5.31  % Process 85453 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.03/5.31  % Sat Sep 26 08:03:11 2026
% 0.03/5.31  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/5.32  
% 0.03/5.32  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.03/5.33  
% 0.03/5.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.03/5.33  
% 0.03/5.33  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.03/5.33  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.03/5.33  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.03/5.33  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.03/5.33  % Given clauses 32.
% 0.03/5.33  
% 0.03/5.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------