↑ Up

SOS---2.0.TMO-Non.f

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET673+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:19:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.02s 300.18s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET673+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 21:14:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.37  Sun Jul 10 21:14:26 2022
% 0.19/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 3589.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c5,set_type).
% 0.19/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c4,set_type).
% 0.19/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c3,set_type).
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 95.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 94.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 89.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 83.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 82.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 48.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 43.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 40.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 39.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 35.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 31.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 20.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 19.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 16.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 4.
% 0.19/0.37  129 back subsumes 3.
% 0.19/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 132 during input processing: 0 [copy,132,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.37  132 back subsumes 28.
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.43  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.43  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.43  number of clauses in intial UL: 109
% 0.19/0.43  number of clauses initially in problem: 114
% 0.19/0.43  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 95
% 0.19/0.43  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.19/0.43  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.43  absolute distinct symbol count: 32
% 0.19/0.43     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.43     distinct function count: 19
% 0.19/0.43     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.02/300.18  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------