↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET675+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:11:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  36 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   87 (  36 equ;  54 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | image(X,domain_of(X)) = range_of(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | inverse2(X,range_of(X)) = domain_of(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | image4(X,Y,Z,X) = range(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | inverse4(X,Y,Z,Y) = domain(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ilf_type(Z,subset_type(cross_product(X,Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ relation_like(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p12) ).

cnf(41,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,subset_type(cross_product(X,Y)))
    | relation_like(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23) ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | domain(X,Y,Z) = domain_of(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p27) ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | range(X,Y,Z) = range_of(Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p29) ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ ilf_type(U,set_type)
    | image4(X,Y,Z,U) = image(Z,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p31) ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Y,set_type)
    | ~ ilf_type(Z,relation_type(X,Y))
    | ~ ilf_type(U,set_type)
    | inverse4(X,Y,Z,U) = inverse2(Z,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p33) ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ilf_type(X,set_type),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p35) ).

cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_type('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_39) ).

cnf(57,negated_conjecture,
    ( image4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV11')) != range('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13')
    | inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',image4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')) != domain('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_relset_1_39) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | image4(Y,Z,X,Y) = range(Y,Z,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[3,55]) ).

cnf(59,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | inverse4(Y,Z,X,Z) = domain(Y,Z,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[4,55]) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | ilf_type(X,subset_type(cross_product(Y,Z))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,55]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( ilf_type(X,binary_relation_type)
    | ~ relation_like(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[16,55]) ).

cnf(84,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,subset_type(cross_product(Y,Z)))
    | relation_like(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[41,55]) ).

cnf(88,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | domain(Y,Z,X) = domain_of(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[47,55]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | range(Y,Z,X) = range_of(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[49,55]) ).

cnf(92,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | image4(Y,Z,X,U) = image(X,U) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[51,55]) ).

cnf(94,plain,
    ( ~ ilf_type(X,relation_type(Y,Z))
    | inverse4(Y,Z,X,U) = inverse2(X,U) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[53,55]) ).

cnf(123,plain,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV13',subset_type(cross_product('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[61,56]) ).

cnf(125,plain,
    domain('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13') = domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[88,56]) ).

cnf(126,plain,
    ( image4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV11')) != range('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13')
    | inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',image4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')) != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[57,125,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    range('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13') = range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[90,56]) ).

cnf(131,plain,
    ( image4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV11')) != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')
    | inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',image4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')) != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[126,130,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(139,plain,
    image4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',X) = image('SKOLEMAAAV13',X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[92,56]) ).

cnf(141,plain,
    ( image('SKOLEMAAAV13',inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV11')) != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')
    | inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',image('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')) != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[131,139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    inverse4('SKOLEMAAAV12','SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13',X) = inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13',X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[94,56]) ).

cnf(145,plain,
    ( image('SKOLEMAAAV13',inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV11')) != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')
    | inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13',image('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')) != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[141,144,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(149,plain,
    image('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12') = range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[58,56]),130,139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(150,plain,
    ( image('SKOLEMAAAV13',inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV11')) != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')
    | inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13',range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')) != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[145,149,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(152,plain,
    inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV11') = domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[59,56]),125,144,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(153,plain,
    ( image('SKOLEMAAAV13',domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')) != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')
    | inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13',range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')) != domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[150,152,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(187,plain,
    relation_like('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[84,123]) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    ilf_type('SKOLEMAAAV13',binary_relation_type),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[66,187]) ).

cnf(193,plain,
    inverse2('SKOLEMAAAV13',range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')) = domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,189]) ).

cnf(194,plain,
    image('SKOLEMAAAV13',domain_of('SKOLEMAAAV13')) != range_of('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[153,193,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(195,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,189]),194]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET675+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 07:59:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T07:59:08
% 0.20/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T07:59:08
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  #||
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.56  ||#
% 0.39/0.56  
% 0.39/0.56  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.39/0.56  ;       316 formulas have been input or derived (from 62 formulas).
% 0.39/0.56  ;       195 (62%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.39/0.56  ;           62 (32%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.39/0.56  ;          133 (68%) are still being kept.
% 0.39/0.56  ; 
% 0.39/0.56  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.011  13%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.002   2%   Assert                       (36 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.018  22%   Process new row              (262 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.003   4%   Resolution                   (122 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.001   1%   Paramodulation               (61 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (6 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.004   5%   Condensing                   (149 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.005   6%   Forward subsumption          (149 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.002   2%   Backward subsumption         (135 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (53 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.005   6%   Forward simplification       (262 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.005   6%   Backward simplification      (195 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (131 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.024  29%   Other
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.082        Total
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.088        Real time
% 0.39/0.56  ; 
% 0.39/0.56  ; Term-hash-array has 368 terms in all.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 77 entries (78 at peak, 135 added, 58 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 352 nodes (365 at peak, 686 added, 334 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ;  Retrieved 57 possibly forward subsuming rows in 149 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ;  Retrieved 10 possibly backward subsumed rows in 135 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Path-index has 304 entries (304 at peak, 435 added, 131 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Path-index has 1,033 nodes (1,033 at peak, 1,283 added, 250 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Trie-index has 304 entries (304 at peak, 435 added, 131 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Trie-index has 1,021 nodes (1,021 at peak, 1,458 added, 437 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Retrieved 165 generalization terms in 460 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Retrieved 89 instance terms in 59 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Retrieved 1,312 unifiable terms in 424 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; 
% 0.39/0.56  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     2 with value 14
% 0.39/0.56  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     1 with value 10
% 0.39/0.56  ; The agenda of rows to give has 71 entries:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     3 with value (4 10)          4 with value (4 18)           1 with value (4 25)
% 0.39/0.56  ;    10 with value (4 11)          9 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 26)
% 0.39/0.56  ;    10 with value (4 12)          3 with value (4 20)           2 with value (4 27)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     1 with value (4 13)          2 with value (4 21)           1 with value (4 28)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     4 with value (4 14)          1 with value (4 22)           1 with value (4 30)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     3 with value (4 15)          2 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 35)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     4 with value (4 16)          1 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     4 with value (4 17)
% 0.39/0.56  Evaluation took:
% 0.39/0.56    0.088 seconds of real time
% 0.39/0.56    0.071667 seconds of user run time
% 0.39/0.56    0.01722 seconds of system run time
% 0.39/0.56    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.39/0.56    0 page faults and
% 0.39/0.56    7,886,288 bytes consed.
% 0.39/0.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.56  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T07:59:08
% 0.39/0.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.56  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------