%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SET682+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n010.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:01:59 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SET682+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 08:51:15 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18C___F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.38 # % 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 48 Number of unprocessed: 35 % 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.38 # 35 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures. % 0.13/0.38 # There are 6 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.38 # Found 10 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.38 # 6 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.38 # 25 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.38 # 10 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6 % 0.13/0.38 # Returning from population with 14 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.13/0.38 # We now have 14 tableaux to operate on % 0.13/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.39 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.39 % 0.13/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (ilf_type(esk14_0,member_type(esk11_0)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ilf_type(esk5_0,binary_relation_type))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (ilf_type(X1,set_type))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (ilf_type(esk13_0,relation_type(esk11_0,esk12_0)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (member(esk14_0,domain(esk11_0,esk12_0,esk13_0)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ilf_type(esk6_1(X1),subset_type(X1)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (ilf_type(esk2_2(X1,X2),relation_type(X2,X1)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (~empty(esk11_0))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (~empty(esk12_0))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~empty(power_set(X1)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~empty(X1))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (ilf_type(X1,binary_relation_type)|~relation_like(X1))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (~member(X1,range(esk11_0,esk12_0,esk13_0))|~ilf_type(X1,member_type(esk12_0)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~empty(X1)|~member(X2,X1))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (empty(X1)|member(esk4_1(X1),X1))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (relation_like(X1)|member(esk10_1(X1),X1))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (empty(X1)|ilf_type(esk3_1(X1),member_type(X1)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (empty(X1)|member(X2,X1)|~ilf_type(X2,member_type(X1)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (ilf_type(X1,member_type(X2))|~member(X1,X2))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (relation_like(X1)|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3))))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (member(X1,power_set(X2))|~member(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (relation_like(X1)|esk10_1(X1)!=ordered_pair(X2,X3))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ilf_type(X1,subset_type(X2))|~ilf_type(X1,member_type(power_set(X2))))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ilf_type(X1,member_type(power_set(X2)))|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(X2)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (member(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1)|member(X1,power_set(X2)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (domain(X1,X2,X3)=domain_of(X3)|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3))|~ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3))))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (range(X1,X2,X3)=range_of(X3)|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X3,power_set(X2))|~member(X1,X3))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (member(esk1_2(X1,X2),range_of(X2))|~member(X1,domain_of(X2))|~ilf_type(X2,binary_relation_type))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (ilf_type(X1,subset_type(cross_product(X2,X3)))|~ilf_type(X1,relation_type(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (ilf_type(domain(X1,X2,X3),subset_type(X1))|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (ilf_type(range(X1,X2,X3),subset_type(X2))|~ilf_type(X3,relation_type(X1,X2)))). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (ordered_pair(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2))=X2|~relation_like(X1)|~member(X2,X1))). % 0.13/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.39 # Found 4 steps % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (~empty(esk11_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (~empty(esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_228, plain, (member(esk4_1(esk11_0),esk11_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.13/0.39 cnf(i_0_244, plain, (ilf_type(esk4_1(esk11_0),member_type(esk11_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_244, ...])). % 0.13/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.40 # Child (12623) has found a proof. % 0.13/0.40 % 0.13/0.40 # Proof search is over... % 0.13/0.40 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------