↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET684^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   25
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   83 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  497 ( 103 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  670 (  94   ~; 111   |;  32   &; 406   @)
%                                         (  11 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  132 ( 132   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   67 (  63 usr;  13 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   0  !!;  15  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  171 (   0 sgn  91   !;  21   ?; 171   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    in: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    is_a: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    emptyset: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    singleton: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    excl_union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    intersection: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    setminus: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    complement: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    disjoint: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    subset: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    meets: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    misses: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    cartesian_product: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    pair_rel: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    id_rel: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    sub_rel: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    is_rel_on: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    restrict_rel_domain: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    rel_diagonal: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    rel_composition: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    reflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_24,type,
    irreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    symmetric: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_26,type,
    transitive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_27,type,
    equiv_rel: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    rel_codomain: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_29,type,
    rel_domain: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_30,type,
    rel_inverse: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_31,type,
    equiv_classes: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_32,type,
    restrict_rel_codomain: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_33,type,
    rel_field: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_34,type,
    well_founded: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_35,type,
    upwards_well_founded: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_36,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_37,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_38,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_39,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_40,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_41,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_42,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_43,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_44,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_45,type,
    db4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_46,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_47,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_48,type,
    db3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_49,type,
    vIFF: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_53,type,
    sK1: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_55,type,
    sK3: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_58,type,
    sK6: $i > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i > ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(f22,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
        ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 @ X4 ) ) )
    = rel_composition ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^2.ax',rel_composition) ).

thf(f36,conjecture,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( rel_composition @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
    <=> ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(f37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( rel_composition @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 )
      <=> ? [X4: $i] :
            ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 )
            & ( X0 @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f36]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
        ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X3 )
          & ( X0 @ X2 @ X4 ) ) )
    = rel_composition ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( rel_composition
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i,Y3: $i] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
              & ( Y1 @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f90]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( rel_composition @ X3 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2 )
      <=> ? [X4: $i] :
            ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X2 )
            & ( X3 @ X0 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ? [X4: $i] :
            ( ( ( X3 @ X0 @ X4 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
      <=> ( ( rel_composition @ X3 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2 )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f97]) ).

thf(f101,plain,
    ? [X2: $i,X3: $i > $i > $o,X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ? [X4: $i] :
          ( ( ( X3 @ X0 @ X4 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X2 )
            = $true ) )
    <~> ( ( rel_composition @ X3 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ? [X2: $i,X3: $i > $i > $o,X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( ( rel_composition @ X3 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2 )
         != $true )
        | ! [X4: $i] :
            ( ( ( X3 @ X0 @ X4 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ( ( ( rel_composition @ X3 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2 )
          = $true )
        | ? [X4: $i] :
            ( ( ( X3 @ X0 @ X4 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X1 @ X4 @ X2 )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).

thf(f103,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i,X3: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( $true
         != ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X3 @ X2 @ X0 ) )
        | ! [X4: $i] :
            ( ( $true
             != ( X1 @ X2 @ X4 ) )
            | ( ( X3 @ X4 @ X0 )
             != $true ) ) )
      & ( ( $true
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X3 @ X2 @ X0 ) )
        | ? [X5: $i] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 @ X5 )
              = $true )
            & ( ( X3 @ X5 @ X0 )
              = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f102]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    ( ( ( $true
       != ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
      | ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ X4 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( sK3 @ X4 @ sK0 )
           != $true ) ) )
    & ( ( $true
        = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 )
          = $true )
        & ( ( sK3 @ sK4 @ sK0 )
          = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X5,sK4)],[f103]) ).

thf(f108,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( ( sK3 @ sK4 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ! [X4: $i] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
      | ( ( sK3 @ X4 @ sK0 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ X4 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

thf(f141,plain,
    ( rel_composition
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i,Y3: $i] :
          ( ?? @ $i
          @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
              & ( Y1 @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

thf(f218,definition,
    ( spl5_15
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_15])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f220,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl5_15 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f218]) ).

thf(f222,definition,
    ( spl5_16
  <=> ( $true
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_16])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f223,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | spl5_16 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f222]) ).

thf(f224,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl5_16 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f222]) ).

thf(f225,plain,
    ( spl5_15
    | spl5_16 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f109,f222,f218]) ).

thf(f257,definition,
    ( spl5_23
  <=> ! [X4: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK3 @ X4 @ sK0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ X4 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_23])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f258,plain,
    ( ! [X4: $i] :
        ( ( ( sK3 @ X4 @ sK0 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 @ X4 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl5_23 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f257]) ).

thf(f259,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_16
    | spl5_23 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f110,f257,f222]) ).

thf(f316,definition,
    ( spl5_35
  <=> ( rel_composition
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i,Y3: $i] :
            ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
                & ( Y1 @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_35])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f318,plain,
    ( ( rel_composition
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i,Y3: $i] :
            ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
                & ( Y1 @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f316]) ).

thf(f319,plain,
    spl5_35,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f141,f316]) ).

thf(f326,definition,
    ( spl5_37
  <=> ( ( sK3 @ sK4 @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_37])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f328,plain,
    ( ( ( sK3 @ sK4 @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl5_37 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f326]) ).

thf(f329,plain,
    ( spl5_37
    | spl5_16 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f108,f222,f326]) ).

thf(f341,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i,Y3: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y4 )
                  & ( Y1 @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) )
          @ X1 )
        = ( rel_composition @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f318]) ).

thf(f342,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i,Y2: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                  ( ( X1 @ Y1 @ Y3 )
                  & ( Y0 @ Y3 @ Y2 ) ) ) )
        = ( rel_composition @ X1 ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f341]) ).

thf(f345,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 )
        = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i,Y2: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                  ( ( X1 @ Y1 @ Y3 )
                  & ( Y0 @ Y3 @ Y2 ) ) )
          @ X2 ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f342]) ).

thf(f346,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( X1 @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                  & ( X2 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
        = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f345]) ).

thf(f358,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i,Y1: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( X1 @ Y0 @ Y2 )
                  & ( X2 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
          @ X3 )
        = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f346]) ).

thf(f359,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y1 )
                  & ( X2 @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f358]) ).

thf(f360,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ?? @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y1 )
                  & ( X2 @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X4 )
        = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(argument_congruence,[],[f359]) ).

thf(f361,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
        | ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y1 )
                    & ( X2 @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
            @ X4 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f360]) ).

thf(f362,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ?? @ $i
                @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                    ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y1 )
                    & ( X2 @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
            @ X4 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(iff_proxy_clausification,[],[f360]) ).

thf(f363,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y0 )
                & ( X2 @ Y0 @ X4 ) ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f362]) ).

thf(f364,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y0 )
                & ( X2 @ Y0 @ X4 ) )
            @ X5 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f363]) ).

thf(f365,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
        ( ( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 )
            & ( X2 @ X5 @ X4 ) )
          = $false )
        | ( $true
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f364]) ).

thf(f366,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( X1 @ X3 @ X5 ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( X2 @ X5 @ X4 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f365]) ).

thf(f367,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( ?? @ $i
            @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y0 )
                & ( X2 @ Y0 @ X4 ) ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f361]) ).

thf(f368,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
                ( ( X1 @ X3 @ Y0 )
                & ( X2 @ Y0 @ X4 ) )
            @ ( sK6 @ X3 @ X1 @ X4 @ X2 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f367]) ).

thf(f369,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( sK6 @ X3 @ X1 @ X4 @ X2 ) )
            & ( X2 @ ( sK6 @ X3 @ X1 @ X4 @ X2 ) @ X4 ) ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f368]) ).

thf(f370,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( ( X2 @ ( sK6 @ X3 @ X1 @ X4 @ X2 ) @ X4 )
          = $true )
        | ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f369]) ).

thf(f371,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i > $i > $o,X3: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] :
        ( ( ( X1 @ X3 @ ( sK6 @ X3 @ X1 @ X4 @ X2 ) )
          = $true )
        | ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f369]) ).

thf(f380,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ sK2 @ ( sK6 @ X0 @ X1 @ sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ sK3 @ X0 @ sK0 ) )
        | ( $true != $true ) )
    | ~ spl5_23
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f258,f370]) ).

thf(f388,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i,X1: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( $true
         != ( sK1 @ sK2 @ ( sK6 @ X0 @ X1 @ sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( rel_composition @ X1 @ sK3 @ X0 @ sK0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl5_23
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f380]) ).

thf(f426,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl5_23
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f388,f371]) ).

thf(f440,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl5_23
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f426]) ).

thf(f441,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl5_23
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f440]) ).

thf(f450,definition,
    ( spl5_40
  <=> ( $false
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_40])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f452,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( rel_composition @ sK1 @ sK3 @ sK2 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl5_40 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f450]) ).

thf(f453,plain,
    ( spl5_40
    | ~ spl5_23
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f441,f316,f257,f450]) ).

thf(f486,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_40 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f224,f452]) ).

thf(f490,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_40 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f486]) ).

thf(f491,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_40 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f490]) ).

thf(f508,definition,
    ( spl5_41
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl5_41])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f510,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl5_41 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f508]) ).

thf(f513,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ~ spl5_15
    | ~ spl5_41 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f510,f220]) ).

thf(f515,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl5_15
    | ~ spl5_41 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f513]) ).

thf(f516,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_15
    | ~ spl5_41 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f515]) ).

thf(f536,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK1 @ sK2 @ X0 ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( sK3 @ X0 @ sK0 ) )
        | ( $true != $true ) )
    | spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f223,f366]) ).

thf(f537,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( $false
          = ( sK3 @ X0 @ sK0 ) )
        | ( $false
          = ( sK1 @ sK2 @ X0 ) ) )
    | spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_35 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f536]) ).

thf(f538,plain,
    ( ( $false = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_35
    | ~ spl5_37 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f537,f328]) ).

thf(f544,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK1 @ sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_35
    | ~ spl5_37 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f538]) ).

thf(f546,plain,
    ( spl5_41
    | spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_35
    | ~ spl5_37 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f544,f326,f316,f222,f508]) ).

cnf(s15,plain,
    ( spl5_15
    | spl5_16 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f225]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_16
    | spl5_23 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f259]) ).

cnf(s34,plain,
    spl5_35,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f319]) ).

cnf(s36,plain,
    ( spl5_16
    | spl5_37 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f329]) ).

cnf(s39,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_23
    | ~ spl5_35
    | spl5_40 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f453]) ).

cnf(s41,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_40 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f491]) ).

cnf(s46,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_15
    | ~ spl5_41 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f516]) ).

cnf(s48,plain,
    ( spl5_16
    | ~ spl5_35
    | ~ spl5_37
    | spl5_41 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f546]) ).

cnf(s50,plain,
    ~ spl5_16,
    inference(rat,[],[s39,s22,s41,s34]) ).

cnf(s51,plain,
    spl5_37,
    inference(rat,[],[s36,s50]) ).

cnf(s52,plain,
    spl5_15,
    inference(rat,[],[s15,s50]) ).

cnf(s53,plain,
    spl5_41,
    inference(rat,[],[s48,s50,s34,s51]) ).

cnf(s55,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s46,s53,s52]) ).

thf(f547,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s55]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET684^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.18  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:42:28 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515483)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515491)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=733876843:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515494)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515494)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1685682646:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515492)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=2427793276:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515488)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1604909233:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515489)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=337166301:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515493)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=193480197:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515494)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=4030623856:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Peak memory usage: 10 MB
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515490)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515491) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2515483-2515491"...
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515491)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.28  % (2515491)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515491)Instructions burned: 33 (million)
% 0.21/0.29  % (2515483)Success in time 0.047 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------