↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SET687+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:22:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.67s 0.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : SET687+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 14:36:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.71  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.59/0.71  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.71  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.59/0.71  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.59/0.71  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.59/0.71  
% 0.59/0.71  % Result      :Theorem 0.090000s
% 0.59/0.71  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.090000s
% 0.59/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.72  % File     : SET687+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.59/0.72  % Domain   : Set Theory (Naive)
% 0.59/0.72  % Problem  : A set is a subset of itself
% 0.59/0.72  % Version  : [Pas99] axioms.
% 0.59/0.72  % English  :
% 0.59/0.72  
% 0.59/0.72  % Refs     : [Pas99] Pastre (1999), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.59/0.72  % Source   : [Pas99]
% 0.59/0.72  % Names    :
% 0.59/0.72  
% 0.59/0.72  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.59/0.72  % Rating   : 0.03 v7.3.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.5.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.04 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.09 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.2.1
% 0.59/0.72  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.59/0.72  %            Number of atoms       :   30 (   3 equ)
% 0.59/0.72  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.59/0.72  %            Number of connectives :   20 (   2   ~;   2   |;   4   &)
% 0.67/0.72  %                                         (  10 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.67/0.72  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
% 0.67/0.72  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.67/0.72  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.67/0.72  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.67/0.72  %            Number of variables   :   29 (  28   !;   1   ?)
% 0.67/0.72  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  % Comments :
% 0.67/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  %----Include set theory definitions
% 0.67/0.72  include('Axioms/SET006+0.ax').
% 0.67/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  fof(thI01,conjecture,
% 0.67/0.72      ! [A] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.72  % Proof found
% 0.67/0.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.67/0.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.67/0.72  %ClaNum:57(EqnAxiom:27)
% 0.67/0.72  %VarNum:147(SingletonVarNum:72)
% 0.67/0.72  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.67/0.72  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.67/0.72  %SharedTerms:3
% 0.67/0.72  %goalClause: 28
% 0.67/0.72  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.67/0.72  [28]~P1(a1,a1)
% 0.67/0.72  [29]~P2(x291,a2)
% 0.67/0.72  [32]~P3(x322,x321)+P1(x321,x322)
% 0.67/0.72  [33]~P3(x331,x332)+P1(x331,x332)
% 0.67/0.72  [30]~E(x301,x302)+P2(x301,f7(x302))
% 0.67/0.72  [31]E(x311,x312)+~P2(x311,f7(x312))
% 0.67/0.72  [34]~P1(x341,x342)+P2(x341,f8(x342))
% 0.67/0.72  [37]P1(x371,x372)+~P2(x371,f8(x372))
% 0.67/0.72  [38]P1(x381,x382)+P2(f4(x381,x382),x381)
% 0.67/0.72  [41]P2(f5(x411,x412),x412)+P2(x411,f10(x412))
% 0.67/0.72  [47]~P2(x471,f13(x472))+P2(x471,f6(x471,x472))
% 0.67/0.72  [48]~P2(x481,f13(x482))+P2(f6(x481,x482),x482)
% 0.67/0.72  [53]P1(x531,x532)+~P2(f4(x531,x532),x532)
% 0.67/0.72  [54]~P2(x541,f5(x541,x542))+P2(x541,f10(x542))
% 0.67/0.72  [35]~E(x351,x353)+P2(x351,f11(x352,x353))
% 0.67/0.72  [36]~E(x361,x362)+P2(x361,f11(x362,x363))
% 0.67/0.72  [42]~P2(x421,x423)+P2(x421,f12(x422,x423))
% 0.67/0.72  [43]~P2(x431,x432)+P2(x431,f12(x432,x433))
% 0.67/0.72  [50]P2(x501,x502)+~P2(x501,f9(x503,x502))
% 0.67/0.72  [51]P2(x511,x512)+~P2(x511,f9(x512,x513))
% 0.67/0.72  [52]P2(x521,x522)+~P2(x521,f3(x522,x523))
% 0.67/0.72  [56]~P2(x561,x562)+~P2(x561,f3(x563,x562))
% 0.67/0.72  [40]~P1(x402,x401)+~P1(x401,x402)+P3(x401,x402)
% 0.67/0.72  [39]~P2(x391,x393)+P2(x391,x392)+~P1(x393,x392)
% 0.67/0.72  [44]~P2(x443,x442)+~P2(x441,x443)+P2(x441,f13(x442))
% 0.67/0.72  [45]E(x451,x452)+E(x451,x453)+~P2(x451,f11(x453,x452))
% 0.67/0.72  [46]P2(x461,x462)+~P2(x462,x463)+~P2(x461,f10(x463))
% 0.67/0.72  [49]~P2(x491,x493)+P2(x491,x492)+P2(x491,f3(x493,x492))
% 0.67/0.72  [55]~P2(x551,x553)+~P2(x551,x552)+P2(x551,f9(x552,x553))
% 0.67/0.72  [57]P2(x571,x572)+P2(x571,x573)+~P2(x571,f12(x573,x572))
% 0.67/0.72  %EqnAxiom
% 0.67/0.72  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.67/0.72  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.67/0.72  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.67/0.72  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f7(x41),f7(x42))
% 0.67/0.72  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f12(x51,x53),f12(x52,x53))
% 0.67/0.72  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f12(x63,x61),f12(x63,x62))
% 0.67/0.72  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f8(x71),f8(x72))
% 0.67/0.72  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f11(x81,x83),f11(x82,x83))
% 0.67/0.72  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f11(x93,x91),f11(x93,x92))
% 0.67/0.72  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f10(x101),f10(x102))
% 0.67/0.72  [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f5(x111,x113),f5(x112,x113))
% 0.67/0.72  [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f5(x123,x121),f5(x123,x122))
% 0.67/0.72  [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f4(x131,x133),f4(x132,x133))
% 0.67/0.72  [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f4(x143,x141),f4(x143,x142))
% 0.67/0.72  [15]~E(x151,x152)+E(f3(x151,x153),f3(x152,x153))
% 0.67/0.72  [16]~E(x161,x162)+E(f3(x163,x161),f3(x163,x162))
% 0.67/0.72  [17]~E(x171,x172)+E(f9(x171,x173),f9(x172,x173))
% 0.67/0.72  [18]~E(x181,x182)+E(f9(x183,x181),f9(x183,x182))
% 0.67/0.72  [19]~E(x191,x192)+E(f13(x191),f13(x192))
% 0.67/0.72  [20]~E(x201,x202)+E(f6(x201,x203),f6(x202,x203))
% 0.67/0.72  [21]~E(x211,x212)+E(f6(x213,x211),f6(x213,x212))
% 0.67/0.72  [22]P1(x222,x223)+~E(x221,x222)+~P1(x221,x223)
% 0.67/0.72  [23]P1(x233,x232)+~E(x231,x232)+~P1(x233,x231)
% 0.67/0.72  [24]P2(x242,x243)+~E(x241,x242)+~P2(x241,x243)
% 0.67/0.72  [25]P2(x253,x252)+~E(x251,x252)+~P2(x253,x251)
% 0.67/0.72  [26]P3(x262,x263)+~E(x261,x262)+~P3(x261,x263)
% 0.67/0.72  [27]P3(x273,x272)+~E(x271,x272)+~P3(x273,x271)
% 0.67/0.72  
% 0.67/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(64,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (~P2(x641,a2)),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(rename_variables,[],[29])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(66,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (~P2(x661,f13(a2))),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,29,64,32,38,48])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(167,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (P2(f4(a1,a1),f12(a1,x1671))),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,43,38])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(169,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (P2(f4(a1,a1),f12(a1,x1691))),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(rename_variables,[],[167])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(170,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     (~P2(x1701,f13(a2))),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(rename_variables,[],[66])).
% 0.67/0.73  cnf(174,plain,
% 0.67/0.73     ($false),
% 0.67/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,66,170,167,169,57,25,53]),
% 0.67/0.73     ['proof']).
% 0.67/0.73  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.67/0.73  % Total time :0.090000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------