↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET687+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  15   ~;  12   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  18   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(thI01,conjecture,
    ! [A] : subset(A,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thI01) ).

fof(thI01_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : subset(A,A),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI01]) ).

fof(nnf_12,plain,
    ? [A] : ~ subset(A,A),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thI01_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thI01_neg,plain,
    ~ subset(sK0,sK0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(A,sK0)],[nnf_12]) ).

cnf(c_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK0,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thI01_neg]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [X] :
            ( ~ member(X,B)
            & member(X,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).

fof(sk_subset_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK1(A,B),B)
          & member(sK1(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X,sK1(A,B))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subset,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_sk]) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK1(A,B),B)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    ( member(sK1(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1(sK0,sK0),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1(sK0,sK0),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_81]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET687+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:05:29 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 4178346 was started by sandbox2 on n011,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:05:29 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.37  
% 0.08/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.08/0.38  % Length of proof is 7.
% 0.08/0.38  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.08/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.08/0.38  % Given clauses 26.
% 0.08/0.38  
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------