↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET688+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:47:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.80s 21.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  115 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  129 (  55   ~;  39   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   0 sgn  51   !;   8   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equal_set(X0,X1)
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',equal_set) ).

fof(f12,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ equal_set(X1,X2)
        & subset(X1,X2)
        & ~ equal_set(X0,X1)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => ~ equal_set(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI04) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( ~ equal_set(X1,X2)
          & subset(X1,X2)
          & ~ equal_set(X0,X1)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
       => ~ equal_set(X0,X2) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ equal_set(X1,X2)
      & subset(X1,X2)
      & ~ equal_set(X0,X1)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & equal_set(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ equal_set(X1,X2)
      & subset(X1,X2)
      & ~ equal_set(X0,X1)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & equal_set(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ member(X2,X0)
          | member(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( ~ equal_set(sK1,sK2)
    & subset(sK1,sK2)
    & ~ equal_set(sK0,sK1)
    & subset(sK0,sK1)
    & equal_set(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f15]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ member(X2,X0)
            | member(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( member(sK3(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ member(sK3(X0,X1),X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X2,sK3(X0,X1))],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ equal_set(X0,X1)
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | equal_set(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ equal_set(X0,X1)
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | equal_set(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ~ equal_set(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    equal_set(sK0,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(X3,X0)
      | member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK3(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK3(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equal_set(X0,X1)
      | subset(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    equal_set(sK0,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(sK3(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | member(sK3(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X2,X1)
      | ~ member(X2,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equal_set(X0,X1)
      | ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    subset(sK2,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_118,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ subset(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_119,plain,
    ~ subset(sK2,sK1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_52,c_118]) ).

tcf(c_188,plain,
    member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK2),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_192,plain,
    ~ member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_119]) ).

tcf(c_327,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(sK3(sK2,sK1),X0)
      | ~ subset(sK2,X0)
      | ~ member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_332,plain,
    ( member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK0)
    | ~ subset(sK2,sK0)
    | ~ member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_327]) ).

tcf(c_333,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(sK3(sK2,sK1),X0)
      | ~ subset(sK0,X0)
      | ~ member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_334,plain,
    ( member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK1)
    | ~ subset(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ member(sK3(sK2,sK1),sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_333]) ).

tcf(c_335,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_332,c_192,c_188,c_104,c_50]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET688+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/20.62  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/20.62  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/20.62  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/20.62  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/20.62  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/20.62  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/20.62  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/20.62  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:41:12 UTC 2026
% 0.11/20.62  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/20.62  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/20.66  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/20.66  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/20.67  
% 0.11/20.67  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/20.67  
% 0.11/20.67  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/20.68  % Proving...
% 3.80/21.54  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.80/21.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.80/21.54  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.80/21.54  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Proving...
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % 
% 3.80/21.54  % clauses                               9
% 3.80/21.54  % conjectures                           2
% 3.80/21.54  % EPR                                   7
% 3.80/21.54  % Horn                                  8
% 3.80/21.54  % unary                                 6
% 3.80/21.54  % binary                                2
% 3.80/21.54  % lits                                  13
% 3.80/21.54  % lits eq                               0
% 3.80/21.54  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.80/21.54  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.80/21.54  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.80/21.54  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.80/21.54  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ 
% 3.80/21.54  % Current options:
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % ------ Proving...
% 3.80/21.54  % 
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.80/21.54  
% 3.80/21.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------