↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET689+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  26   ~;  22   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   0 sgn  24   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(equal_set,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( equal_set(A,B)
    <=> ( subset(B,A)
        & subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equal_set) ).

fof(thI05,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( subset(C,A)
        & subset(B,C)
        & subset(A,B) )
     => equal_set(A,C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thI05) ).

fof(thI05_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( subset(C,A)
          & subset(B,C)
          & subset(A,B) )
       => equal_set(A,C) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI05]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [X] :
            ( ~ member(X,B)
            & member(X,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).

fof(sk_subset_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK0(A,B),B)
          & member(sK0(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0(A,B))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subset,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_sk]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( member(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK0(A,B),B)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( ~ subset(B,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B)
    | equal_set(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equal_set]) ).

fof(nnf_12,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ~ equal_set(A,C)
      & subset(C,A)
      & subset(B,C)
      & subset(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thI05_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thI05_neg,plain,
    ( ~ equal_set(sK1,sK3)
    & subset(sK3,sK1)
    & subset(sK2,sK3)
    & subset(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(C,sK3)],[nnf_12]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thI05_neg]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK2,sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thI05_neg]) ).

cnf(c_44,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK3,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thI05_neg]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(sK1,sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thI05_neg]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( member(sK0(A,B),A)
    | ~ subset(B,A)
    | equal_set(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    ( member(A,sK2)
    | ~ member(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_94,plain,
    ( member(A,sK3)
    | ~ member(A,sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_243,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK1,sK3)
    | equal_set(sK1,sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK1,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_243]) ).

cnf(c_244,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(sK0(sK1,sK3),sK1)
    | equal_set(sK1,sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_44]) ).

cnf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0(sK1,sK3),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_244]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    ~ member(sK0(sK1,sK3),sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_96]) ).

cnf(c_225,plain,
    ~ member(sK0(sK1,sK3),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_109]) ).

cnf(c_245,plain,
    ~ member(sK0(sK1,sK3),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_225]) ).

cnf(c_242,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_245]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET689+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:05:16 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 1649304 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:05:16 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.12/0.39  % Length of proof is 19.
% 0.12/0.39  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.12/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.12/0.39  % Given clauses 58.
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------