↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET696+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  33   ~;  24   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   4 sgn  34   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thI28,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( subset(X1,X4)
     => equal_set(intersection(difference(X4,X1),X1),empty_set) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI28) ).

fof(equal_set,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( equal_set(X1,X2)
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',equal_set) ).

fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(empty_set,axiom,
    ! [X3] : ~ member(X3,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',empty_set) ).

fof(difference,axiom,
    ! [X2,X1,X4] :
      ( member(X2,difference(X4,X1))
    <=> ( member(X2,X4)
        & ~ member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',difference) ).

fof(intersection,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',intersection) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X4] :
        ( subset(X1,X4)
       => equal_set(intersection(difference(X4,X1),X1),empty_set) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI28]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & ~ equal_set(intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0),empty_set) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X42,X43] :
      ( ( subset(X42,X43)
        | ~ equal_set(X42,X43) )
      & ( subset(X43,X42)
        | ~ equal_set(X42,X43) )
      & ( ~ subset(X42,X43)
        | ~ subset(X43,X42)
        | equal_set(X42,X43) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_set])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0),empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( equal_set(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X36,X37,X38,X39,X40] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X36,X37)
        | ~ member(X38,X36)
        | member(X38,X37) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X39,X40),X39)
        | subset(X39,X40) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X39,X40),X40)
        | subset(X39,X40) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3] : ~ member(X3,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(empty_set,intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0))
    | ~ subset(intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0),empty_set) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X52] : ~ member(X52,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X2,X1,X4] :
      ( member(X2,difference(X4,X1))
    <=> ( member(X2,X4)
        & ~ member(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[difference]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X46,X47,X48] :
      ( ( member(X46,X47)
        | ~ member(X46,intersection(X47,X48)) )
      & ( member(X46,X48)
        | ~ member(X46,intersection(X47,X48)) )
      & ( ~ member(X46,X47)
        | ~ member(X46,X48)
        | member(X46,intersection(X47,X48)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk1_2(intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0),empty_set),intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0))
    | ~ subset(empty_set,intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X53,X54,X55] :
      ( ( member(X53,X55)
        | ~ member(X53,difference(X55,X54)) )
      & ( ~ member(X53,X54)
        | ~ member(X53,difference(X55,X54)) )
      & ( ~ member(X53,X55)
        | member(X53,X54)
        | member(X53,difference(X55,X54)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk1_2(intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0),empty_set),intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,difference(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk1_2(intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0),empty_set),difference(esk5_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk1_2(intersection(difference(esk5_0,esk4_0),esk4_0),empty_set),esk4_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET696+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:32:36 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------