↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET696+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 63.72s 8.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 63.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  26   ~;  21   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   7 sgn  29   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(equal_set,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( equal_set(A,B)
    <=> ( subset(B,A)
        & subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equal_set) ).

fof(intersection,axiom,
    ! [X,A,B] :
      ( member(X,intersection(A,B))
    <=> ( member(X,B)
        & member(X,A) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',intersection) ).

fof(empty_set,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ member(X,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set) ).

fof(difference,axiom,
    ! [B,A,E] :
      ( member(B,difference(E,A))
    <=> ( ~ member(B,A)
        & member(B,E) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',difference) ).

fof(thI28,conjecture,
    ! [A,E] :
      ( subset(A,E)
     => equal_set(intersection(difference(E,A),A),empty_set) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thI28) ).

fof(thI28_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,E] :
        ( subset(A,E)
       => equal_set(intersection(difference(E,A),A),empty_set) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI28]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [X] :
            ( ~ member(X,B)
            & member(X,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).

fof(sk_subset_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK0(A,B),B)
          & member(sK0(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0(A,B))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subset,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_sk]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( member(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( ~ subset(B,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B)
    | equal_set(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equal_set]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    ( member(A,B)
    | ~ member(A,intersection(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intersection]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( member(A,C)
    | ~ member(A,intersection(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[intersection]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    ~ member(A,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[empty_set]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(A,C)
    | ~ member(A,difference(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[difference]) ).

fof(nnf_12,plain,
    ? [A,E] :
      ( ~ equal_set(intersection(difference(E,A),A),empty_set)
      & subset(A,E) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thI28_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thI28_neg,plain,
    ( ~ equal_set(intersection(difference(sK1,sK2),sK2),empty_set)
    & subset(sK2,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK2),skolemize(E,sK1)],[nnf_12]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(intersection(difference(sK1,sK2),sK2),empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thI28_neg]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(A,B),C)
    | member(sK0(intersection(A,B),C),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(A,B),C)
    | member(sK0(intersection(A,B),C),B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    subset(empty_set,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_1719,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(empty_set,intersection(difference(sK1,sK2),sK2))
    | ~ subset(intersection(difference(sK1,sK2),sK2),empty_set) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_215,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(intersection(difference(sK1,sK2),sK2),empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1719,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_1720,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(difference(A,B),C),D)
    | ~ member(sK0(intersection(difference(A,B),C),D),B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_1721,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(difference(A,B),B),C)
    | subset(intersection(difference(A,B),B),C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1720,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_1717,plain,
    subset(intersection(difference(A,B),B),C),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1721]) ).

cnf(c_1718,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1717,c_215]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET696+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:05:52 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/0.45  % Process 1191783 was started by sandbox on n004,
% 0.18/0.45  % Sat Sep 26 08:05:52 2026
% 0.18/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 63.72/8.70  
% 63.72/8.70  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 63.72/8.70  
% 63.72/8.70  % Proof 1 at 0.12 (+ 0.07) seconds.
% 63.72/8.70  % Length of proof is 19.
% 63.72/8.70  % Level of proof is 4.
% 63.72/8.70  % Maximum clause weight is 27.000.
% 63.72/8.70  % Given clauses 124.
% 63.72/8.70  
% 63.72/8.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------