%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SET697+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:02:05 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SET697+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:30:28 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C36_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y % 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.12/0.37 # % 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 33 Number of unprocessed: 33 % 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.37 # 33 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures. % 0.12/0.37 # There are 4 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.37 # Found 6 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.12/0.37 # 4 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.37 # 27 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.37 # 6 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4 % 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.37 # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on % 0.19/0.44 # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.44 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.19/0.44 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.19/0.44 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.19/0.44 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations. % 0.19/0.44 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.19/0.44 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.19/0.44 # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.19/0.44 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.44 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.44 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.19/0.44 % 0.19/0.44 # End clausification derivation % 0.19/0.44 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk4_0,esk6_0))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (subset(esk5_0,esk6_0))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (member(X1,singleton(X1)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~member(X1,empty_set))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~equal_set(X2,X1))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~equal_set(X1,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (equal_set(intersection(esk4_0,difference(esk6_0,esk5_0)),empty_set)|subset(esk4_0,esk5_0))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (equal_set(X1,X2)|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (X1=X2|~member(X1,singleton(X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (member(X1,power_set(X2))|~subset(X1,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(X1,power_set(X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (~equal_set(intersection(esk4_0,difference(esk6_0,esk5_0)),empty_set)|~subset(esk4_0,esk5_0))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,intersection(X3,X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,difference(X2,X3)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)|subset(X1,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (~member(X1,difference(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (X1=X2|X1=X3|~member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X3)|~subset(X3,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (member(X1,union(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (member(X1,difference(X2,X3))|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|member(X1,product(X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (member(X1,sum(X2))|~member(X1,X3)|~member(X3,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,X2))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (member(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2))|~member(X1,sum(X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~member(X1,sum(X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (member(X1,product(X2))|~member(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (member(X1,X2)|member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,union(X2,X3)))). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,product(X3))|~member(X2,X3))). % 0.19/0.44 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.19/0.44 # Begin printing tableau % 0.19/0.44 # Found 6 steps % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (equal_set(intersection(esk4_0,difference(esk6_0,esk5_0)),empty_set)|subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (equal_set(intersection(esk4_0,difference(esk6_0,esk5_0)),empty_set)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_167, plain, (subset(empty_set,intersection(esk4_0,difference(esk6_0,esk5_0)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_40, ...])). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_233, plain, (equal_set(empty_set,intersection(esk4_0,difference(esk6_0,esk5_0)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_233, ...])). % 0.19/0.44 cnf(i_0_234, plain, (~subset(intersection(esk4_0,difference(esk6_0,esk5_0)),empty_set)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_234, ...])). % 0.19/0.44 # End printing tableau % 0.19/0.44 # SZS output end % 0.19/0.44 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.19/0.45 # Child (9741) has found a proof. % 0.19/0.45 % 0.19/0.45 # Proof search is over... % 0.19/0.45 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------