↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET704+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:47:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.50s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  28   ~;  24   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn  44   !;   5   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,product(X1))
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X1)
         => member(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',product) ).

fof(f12,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X1,X0)
     => subset(product(X0),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI42) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( member(X1,X0)
       => subset(product(X0),X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) )
     => subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X1,X0)
      & ~ subset(product(X0),X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
          & ~ member(X2,X1) )
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,product(X1))
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ member(X2,X1)
          | member(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( member(sK1,sK0)
    & ~ subset(product(sK0),sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f15]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( member(sK2(X0,X1),X0)
        & ~ member(sK2(X0,X1),X1) )
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X2,sK2(X0,X1))],[f16]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ member(X0,product(X1))
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ member(X2,X1)
            | member(X0,X2) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X1)
            & ~ member(X0,X2) )
        | member(X0,product(X1)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ member(X0,product(X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X1)
            | member(X0,X3) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X1)
            & ~ member(X0,X2) )
        | member(X0,product(X1)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ member(X0,product(X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X1)
            | member(X0,X3) ) )
      & ( ( member(sK3(X0,X1),X1)
          & ~ member(X0,sK3(X0,X1)) )
        | member(X0,product(X1)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X2,sK3(X0,X1))],[f21]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    member(sK1,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ~ subset(product(sK0),sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK2(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK2(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X0,product(X1))
      | ~ member(X3,X1)
      | member(X0,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(product(sK0),sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(sK2(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | member(sK2(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X2,X1)
      | ~ member(X0,product(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    member(sK2(product(sK0),sK1),product(sK0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_90,plain,
    ~ member(sK2(product(sK0),sK1),sK1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_116,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(X0,sK1)
      | ~ member(sK1,sK0)
      | ~ member(X0,product(sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).

tcf(c_124,plain,
    ( member(sK2(product(sK0),sK1),sK1)
    | ~ member(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ member(sK2(product(sK0),sK1),product(sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_116]) ).

tcf(c_125,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_90,c_86,c_50]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET704+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:41:25 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.33  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.37  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.40  % Proving...
% 3.50/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.50/1.15  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.50/1.15  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Proving...
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % 
% 3.50/1.15  % clauses                               6
% 3.50/1.15  % conjectures                           1
% 3.50/1.15  % EPR                                   1
% 3.50/1.15  % Horn                                  5
% 3.50/1.15  % unary                                 3
% 3.50/1.15  % binary                                2
% 3.50/1.15  % lits                                  10
% 3.50/1.15  % lits eq                               0
% 3.50/1.15  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.50/1.15  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.50/1.15  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.50/1.15  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.50/1.15  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ 
% 3.50/1.15  % Current options:
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % ------ Proving...
% 3.50/1.15  % 
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.50/1.15  
% 3.50/1.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------