↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET731+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:41:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.37s 1.38s
% Output   : Refutation 3.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  146 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  174 (  64   ~;  60   |;  37   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  113 (  92   !;  21   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X2)
         => ? [X4] :
              ( member(X4,X1)
              & apply(X0,X4,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',surjective) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
          & apply(X0,X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',image2) ).

fof(f29,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( maps(X0,X2,X3)
        & subset(X4,X3)
        & image2(X0,X2) = X4
        & ! [X5,X6] :
            ( ( member(X5,X2)
              & member(X6,X4) )
           => ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
            <=> apply(X0,X5,X6) ) ) )
     => surjective(X1,X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thII22) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( maps(X0,X2,X3)
          & subset(X4,X3)
          & image2(X0,X2) = X4
          & ! [X5,X6] :
              ( ( member(X5,X2)
                & member(X6,X4) )
             => ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
              <=> apply(X0,X5,X6) ) ) )
       => surjective(X1,X2,X4) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f29]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X2)
         => ? [X4] :
              ( member(X4,X1)
              & apply(X0,X4,X3) ) )
     => surjective(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ surjective(X1,X2,X4)
      & maps(X0,X2,X3)
      & subset(X4,X3)
      & image2(X0,X2) = X4
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
          <=> apply(X0,X5,X6) )
          | ~ member(X5,X2)
          | ~ member(X6,X4) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ surjective(X1,X2,X4)
      & maps(X0,X2,X3)
      & subset(X4,X3)
      & image2(X0,X2) = X4
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
          <=> apply(X0,X5,X6) )
          | ~ member(X5,X2)
          | ~ member(X6,X4) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
      | ? [X3] :
          ( ! [X4] :
              ( ~ member(X4,X1)
              | ~ apply(X0,X4,X3) )
          & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ surjective(X1,X2,X4)
      & maps(X0,X2,X3)
      & subset(X4,X3)
      & image2(X0,X2) = X4
      & ! [X5,X6] :
          ( ( ( apply(X1,X5,X6)
              | ~ apply(X0,X5,X6) )
            & ( apply(X0,X5,X6)
              | ~ apply(X1,X5,X6) ) )
          | ~ member(X5,X2)
          | ~ member(X6,X4) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( ~ surjective(sK1,sK2,sK4)
    & maps(sK0,sK2,sK3)
    & subset(sK4,sK3)
    & sK4 = image2(sK0,sK2)
    & ! [X5,X6] :
        ( ( ( apply(sK1,X5,X6)
            | ~ apply(sK0,X5,X6) )
          & ( apply(sK0,X5,X6)
            | ~ apply(sK1,X5,X6) ) )
        | ~ member(X5,sK2)
        | ~ member(X6,sK4) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X4,sK4)],[f41]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( surjective(X0,X1,X2)
      | ( ! [X4] :
            ( ~ member(X4,X1)
            | ~ apply(X0,X4,sK6(X0,X1,X2)) )
        & member(sK6(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6]),skolemize(X3,sK6(X0,X1,X2))],[f40]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X1)
            | ~ apply(X0,X3,X2) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( member(X3,X1)
            & apply(X0,X3,X2) )
        | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X1)
            | ~ apply(X0,X3,X2) ) )
      & ( ? [X4] :
            ( member(X4,X1)
            & apply(X0,X4,X2) )
        | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X1)
            | ~ apply(X0,X3,X2) ) )
      & ( ( member(sK7(X0,X1,X2),X1)
          & apply(X0,sK7(X0,X1,X2),X2) )
        | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7]),skolemize(X4,sK7(X0,X1,X2))],[f46]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X6,X5] :
      ( ~ apply(sK0,X5,X6)
      | apply(sK1,X5,X6)
      | ~ member(X5,sK2)
      | ~ member(X6,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    sK4 = image2(sK0,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ~ surjective(sK1,sK2,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK6(X0,X1,X2),X2)
      | surjective(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ apply(X0,X4,sK6(X0,X1,X2))
      | ~ member(X4,X1)
      | surjective(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( apply(X0,sK7(X0,X1,X2),X2)
      | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK7(X0,X1,X2),X1)
      | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(X3,X1)
      | ~ apply(X0,X3,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apply(sK0,X1,X0)
      | ~ member(X1,sK2)
      | member(X0,sK4) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f62,f50]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK7(sK0,X0,X1),sK2)
      | member(X1,sK4)
      | ~ member(X1,image2(sK0,X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f66,f60]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( apply(sK1,sK7(sK0,X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ member(sK7(sK0,X0,X1),sK2)
      | ~ member(X1,sK4)
      | ~ member(X1,image2(sK0,X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f49,f60]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( apply(sK1,sK7(sK0,X0,X1),X1)
      | ~ member(sK7(sK0,X0,X1),sK2)
      | ~ member(X1,image2(sK0,X0)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f73,f71]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK7(sK0,X0,sK6(sK1,X1,X2)),sK2)
      | ~ member(sK6(sK1,X1,X2),image2(sK0,X0))
      | ~ member(sK7(sK0,X0,sK6(sK1,X1,X2)),X1)
      | surjective(sK1,X1,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f74,f59]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK6(sK1,X0,X1),image2(sK0,sK2))
      | ~ member(sK7(sK0,sK2,sK6(sK1,X0,X1)),X0)
      | surjective(sK1,X0,X1)
      | ~ member(sK6(sK1,X0,X1),image2(sK0,sK2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f83,f61]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK6(sK1,X0,X1),image2(sK0,sK2))
      | ~ member(sK7(sK0,sK2,sK6(sK1,X0,X1)),X0)
      | surjective(sK1,X0,X1) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f102]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK7(sK0,sK2,sK6(sK1,X0,X1)),X0)
      | ~ member(sK6(sK1,X0,X1),sK4)
      | surjective(sK1,X0,X1) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f103,f50]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(sK6(sK1,sK2,X0),sK4)
      | surjective(sK1,sK2,X0)
      | ~ member(sK6(sK1,sK2,X0),image2(sK0,sK2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f104,f61]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(sK6(sK1,sK2,X0),sK4)
      | ~ member(sK6(sK1,sK2,X0),sK4)
      | surjective(sK1,sK2,X0) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f105,f50]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(sK6(sK1,sK2,X0),sK4)
      | surjective(sK1,sK2,X0) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ( surjective(sK1,sK2,sK4)
    | surjective(sK1,sK2,sK4) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f108,f58]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    surjective(sK1,sK2,sK4),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f112,f53]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET731+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.40  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.40  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 02:41:55 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.41  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942849)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942854)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=360586493:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942856)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=3810541389:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942858)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=1779096468:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=1820100269:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942855)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=3928424937:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942859)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=2692016531:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=498376139:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)First to succeed.
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2942849"
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942858)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942859)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Instruction limit reached! 
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)------------------------------
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Time elapsed: 0.078 s
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Peak memory usage: 90 MB
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942860)Instructions burned: 131 (million)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942868)lrs+10_1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:random_seed=2180429586:i=285:sd=3:ss=axioms:sgt=8_2997 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/285Mi)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942868)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.37/1.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.37/1.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)------------------------------
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)------------------------------
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942857)------------------------------
% 3.37/1.38  % (2942849)Success in time 0.408 s
% 3.37/1.38  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------