↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET734+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:08:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.25s 2.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  101 (  37   ~;  37   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-7 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (   0 sgn  43   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thII25,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X10,X1,X2] :
      ( ( maps(X10,X1,X2)
        & maps(X6,X2,X1)
        & identity(compose_function(X10,X6,X2,X1,X2),X2) )
     => surjective(X10,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thII25) ).

fof(identity,axiom,
    ! [X6,X1] :
      ( identity(X6,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => apply(X6,X3,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+1.ax',identity) ).

fof(surjective,axiom,
    ! [X6,X1,X2] :
      ( surjective(X6,X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X5] :
          ( member(X5,X2)
         => ? [X4] :
              ( member(X4,X1)
              & apply(X6,X4,X5) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+1.ax',surjective) ).

fof(compose_function,axiom,
    ! [X10,X6,X1,X2,X11,X3,X12] :
      ( ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X12,X11) )
     => ( apply(compose_function(X10,X6,X1,X2,X11),X3,X12)
      <=> ? [X5] :
            ( member(X5,X2)
            & apply(X6,X3,X5)
            & apply(X10,X5,X12) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+1.ax',compose_function) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X10,X1,X2] :
        ( ( maps(X10,X1,X2)
          & maps(X6,X2,X1)
          & identity(compose_function(X10,X6,X2,X1,X2),X2) )
       => surjective(X10,X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thII25]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X250,X251,X252,X253,X254] :
      ( ( ~ identity(X250,X251)
        | ~ member(X252,X251)
        | apply(X250,X252,X252) )
      & ( member(esk17_2(X253,X254),X254)
        | identity(X253,X254) )
      & ( ~ apply(X253,esk17_2(X253,X254),esk17_2(X253,X254))
        | identity(X253,X254) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[identity])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( maps(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0)
    & maps(esk41_0,esk44_0,esk43_0)
    & identity(compose_function(esk42_0,esk41_0,esk44_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),esk44_0)
    & ~ surjective(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X268,X269,X270,X271,X273,X274,X275,X277] :
      ( ( member(esk21_4(X268,X269,X270,X271),X269)
        | ~ member(X271,X270)
        | ~ surjective(X268,X269,X270) )
      & ( apply(X268,esk21_4(X268,X269,X270,X271),X271)
        | ~ member(X271,X270)
        | ~ surjective(X268,X269,X270) )
      & ( member(esk22_3(X273,X274,X275),X275)
        | surjective(X273,X274,X275) )
      & ( ~ member(X277,X274)
        | ~ apply(X273,X277,esk22_3(X273,X274,X275))
        | surjective(X273,X274,X275) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[surjective])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X3,X3)
    | ~ identity(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    identity(compose_function(esk42_0,esk41_0,esk44_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),esk44_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ surjective(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( member(esk22_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
    | surjective(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X227,X228,X229,X230,X231,X232,X233,X235] :
      ( ( member(esk13_7(X227,X228,X229,X230,X231,X232,X233),X230)
        | ~ apply(compose_function(X227,X228,X229,X230,X231),X232,X233)
        | ~ member(X232,X229)
        | ~ member(X233,X231) )
      & ( apply(X228,X232,esk13_7(X227,X228,X229,X230,X231,X232,X233))
        | ~ apply(compose_function(X227,X228,X229,X230,X231),X232,X233)
        | ~ member(X232,X229)
        | ~ member(X233,X231) )
      & ( apply(X227,esk13_7(X227,X228,X229,X230,X231,X232,X233),X233)
        | ~ apply(compose_function(X227,X228,X229,X230,X231),X232,X233)
        | ~ member(X232,X229)
        | ~ member(X233,X231) )
      & ( ~ member(X235,X230)
        | ~ apply(X228,X232,X235)
        | ~ apply(X227,X235,X233)
        | apply(compose_function(X227,X228,X229,X230,X231),X232,X233)
        | ~ member(X232,X229)
        | ~ member(X233,X231) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[compose_function])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(compose_function(esk42_0,esk41_0,esk44_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),X1,X1)
    | ~ member(X1,esk44_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),esk44_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk13_7(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7),X7)
    | ~ apply(compose_function(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6,X7)
    | ~ member(X6,X3)
    | ~ member(X7,X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    apply(compose_function(esk42_0,esk41_0,esk44_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( member(esk13_7(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7),X4)
    | ~ apply(compose_function(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6,X7)
    | ~ member(X6,X3)
    | ~ member(X7,X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( surjective(X3,X2,X4)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ apply(X3,X1,esk22_3(X3,X2,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    apply(esk42_0,esk13_7(esk42_0,esk41_0,esk44_0,esk43_0,esk44_0,esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0)),esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk13_7(esk42_0,esk41_0,esk44_0,esk43_0,esk44_0,esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0),esk22_3(esk42_0,esk43_0,esk44_0)),esk43_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_10]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SET734+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:33:16 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 2.25/2.09  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 2.25/2.09  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/2.09  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.25/2.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.25/2.10  % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------