↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SET741^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.30s 2.36s
% Output   : Refutation 4.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (   2   ~;   0   |;   8   &;  54   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (  14   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   6   ^;  19   !;   4   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(fun_composition_decl,type,
    fun_composition: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(fun_injective_decl,type,
    fun_injective: ( $i > $i ) > $o ).

thf(fun_surjective_decl,type,
    fun_surjective: ( $i > $i ) > $o ).

thf(fun_bijective_decl,type,
    fun_bijective: ( $i > $i ) > $o ).

thf(fun_composition_def,definition,
    ( fun_composition
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i,B: $i > $i,C: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(fun_injective_def,definition,
    ( fun_injective
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i] :
        ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( ( A @ B )
            = ( A @ C ) )
         => ( B = C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(fun_surjective_def,definition,
    ( fun_surjective
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i] :
        ! [B: $i] :
        ? [C: $i] :
          ( B
          = ( A @ C ) ) ) ) ).

thf(fun_bijective_def,definition,
    ( fun_bijective
    = ( ^ [A: $i > $i] :
          ( ( fun_injective @ A )
          & ( fun_surjective @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i > $i,B: $i > $i,C: $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( fun_injective @ ( fun_composition @ ( fun_composition @ A @ B ) @ C ) )
        & ( fun_surjective @ ( fun_composition @ ( fun_composition @ B @ C ) @ A ) )
        & ( fun_surjective @ ( fun_composition @ ( fun_composition @ C @ A ) @ B ) ) )
     => ( fun_bijective @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $i,B: $i > $i,C: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ( fun_injective @ ( fun_composition @ ( fun_composition @ A @ B ) @ C ) )
          & ( fun_surjective @ ( fun_composition @ ( fun_composition @ B @ C ) @ A ) )
          & ( fun_surjective @ ( fun_composition @ ( fun_composition @ C @ A ) @ B ) ) )
       => ( fun_bijective @ C ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i > $i,B: $i > $i,C: $i > $i] :
        ( ( ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
              ( ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ D ) ) )
                = ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ E ) ) ) )
             => ( D = E ) )
          & ! [D: $i] :
            ? [E: $i] :
              ( D
              = ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ E ) ) ) )
          & ! [D: $i] :
            ? [E: $i] :
              ( D
              = ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ E ) ) ) ) )
       => ( ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
              ( ( ( C @ D )
                = ( C @ E ) )
             => ( D = E ) )
          & ! [D: $i] :
            ? [E: $i] :
              ( D
              = ( C @ E ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET741^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.22  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:41:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.04/0.83  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.46/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (235ms). 
% 1.46/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.30/1.55  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.30/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.54/1.68  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.78/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.78/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.78/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.78/1.72  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.30/2.36  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.30/2.36  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.30/2.36  % Time passed: 1991ms (effective reasoning time: 1265ms)
% 4.30/2.36  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.30/2.36  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 4.30/2.36  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 4.30/2.36  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1991 ms resp. 1265 ms w/o parsing
% 4.57/2.40  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.57/2.40  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------