↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET751+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:48:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.40s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  118 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  129 (  48   ~;  44   |;  31   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  108 (   0 sgn  93   !;  15   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( apply(X0,X3,X2)
          & member(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+1.ax',image2) ).

fof(f29,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( subset(X3,X4)
        & subset(X4,X1)
        & subset(X3,X1)
        & maps(X0,X1,X2) )
     => subset(image2(X0,X3),image2(X0,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thIIa01) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( subset(X3,X4)
          & subset(X4,X1)
          & subset(X3,X1)
          & maps(X0,X1,X2) )
       => subset(image2(X0,X3),image2(X0,X4)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f29]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( subset(X3,X4)
      & subset(X4,X1)
      & subset(X3,X1)
      & maps(X0,X1,X2)
      & ~ subset(image2(X0,X3),image2(X0,X4)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( subset(X3,X4)
      & subset(X4,X1)
      & subset(X3,X1)
      & maps(X0,X1,X2)
      & ~ subset(image2(X0,X3),image2(X0,X4)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ member(X2,X0)
          | member(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( subset(sK3,sK4)
    & subset(sK4,sK1)
    & subset(sK3,sK1)
    & maps(sK0,sK1,sK2)
    & ~ subset(image2(sK0,sK3),image2(sK0,sK4)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X4,sK4)],[f34]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ member(X2,X0)
            | member(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( member(sK5(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ member(sK5(X0,X1),X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5]),skolemize(X2,sK5(X0,X1))],[f40]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ? [X3] :
            ( apply(X0,X3,X2)
            & member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X3,X2)
            | ~ member(X3,X1) )
        | member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ? [X4] :
            ( apply(X0,X4,X2)
            & member(X4,X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X3,X2)
            | ~ member(X3,X1) )
        | member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
        | ( apply(X0,sK7(X0,X1,X2),X2)
          & member(sK7(X0,X1,X2),X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ~ apply(X0,X3,X2)
            | ~ member(X3,X1) )
        | member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7]),skolemize(X4,sK7(X0,X1,X2))],[f44]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    subset(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ~ subset(image2(sK0,sK3),image2(sK0,sK4)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(X3,X0)
      | member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK5(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK5(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
      | apply(X0,sK7(X0,X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
      | member(sK7(X0,X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apply(X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ member(X3,X1)
      | member(X2,image2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(image2(sK0,sK3),image2(sK0,sK4)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(sK5(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | member(sK5(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X2,X1)
      | ~ member(X2,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(X2,image2(X0,X3))
      | ~ member(X1,X3)
      | ~ apply(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(sK7(X1,X2,X0),X2)
      | ~ member(X0,image2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( apply(X1,sK7(X1,X2,X0),X0)
      | ~ member(X0,image2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

tcf(c_835,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(sK7(X1,X2,X0),X3)
      | ~ subset(X2,X3)
      | ~ member(X0,image2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_874,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(X2,image2(X0,X3))
      | ~ member(X2,image2(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(sK7(X0,X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_1461,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(X0,image2(X1,X3))
      | ~ subset(X2,X3)
      | ~ member(X0,image2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_835,c_874]) ).

tcf(c_1541,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( subset(image2(X2,X0),X3)
      | member(sK5(image2(X2,X0),X3),image2(X2,X1))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_1461]) ).

tcf(c_2838,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( subset(image2(X2,X0),image2(X2,X1))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1541,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_2935,plain,
    ~ subset(sK3,sK4),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2838,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_2946,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2935,c_53]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET751+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/5.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 11:54:33 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.42  
% 0.14/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.42  
% 0.14/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.43  % Proving...
% 4.40/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.40/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.40/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.40/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % 
% 4.40/6.30  % clauses                               13
% 4.40/6.30  % conjectures                           4
% 4.40/6.30  % EPR                                   5
% 4.40/6.30  % Horn                                  12
% 4.40/6.30  % unary                                 4
% 4.40/6.30  % binary                                6
% 4.40/6.30  % lits                                  28
% 4.40/6.30  % lits eq                               1
% 4.40/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.40/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.40/6.30  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.40/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 4.40/6.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ 
% 4.40/6.30  % Current options:
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 4.40/6.30  % 
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.40/6.30  
% 4.40/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------