↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET752^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:22:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   28
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  11 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  176 (  78 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   44 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  364 (  56   ~; 106   |;  16   &; 185   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (  12   ^;  29   !;   5   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_28,type,
    union: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    fun_image: ( $i > $i ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_45,type,
    epred1_0: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_46,type,
    epred2_0: $i > $o ).

thf(decl_47,type,
    esk1_0: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_48,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_49,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_50,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(decl_51,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

thf(thm,conjecture,
    ! [X27: $i > $o,X28: $i > $o,X22: $i > $i] :
      ( ( fun_image @ X22 @ ( union @ X27 @ X28 ) )
      = ( union @ ( fun_image @ X22 @ X27 ) @ ( fun_image @ X22 @ X28 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YnvV2NU9la/E---3.1_1261846.p',thm) ).

thf(union,axiom,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o,X4: $i] :
          ( ( X5 @ X4 )
          | ( X6 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YnvV2NU9la/E---3.1_1261846.p',union) ).

thf(fun_image,axiom,
    ( fun_image
    = ( ^ [X22: $i > $i,X23: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( X23 @ X1 )
          & ( X3
            = ( X22 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YnvV2NU9la/E---3.1_1261846.p',fun_image) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X27: $i > $o,X28: $i > $o,X22: $i > $i] :
        ( ( fun_image @ X22 @ ( union @ X27 @ X28 ) )
        = ( union @ ( fun_image @ X22 @ X27 ) @ ( fun_image @ X22 @ X28 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]) ).

thf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( union
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[union]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( fun_image
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( Z1 @ X1 )
          & ( Z2
            = ( Z0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fun_image]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X27: $i > $o,X28: $i > $o,X22: $i > $i,X42: $i] :
        ( ? [X36: $i] :
            ( ( ( X27 @ X36 )
              | ( X28 @ X36 ) )
            & ( X42
              = ( X22 @ X36 ) ) )
      <=> ( ? [X37: $i] :
              ( ( X27 @ X37 )
              & ( X42
                = ( X22 @ X37 ) ) )
          | ? [X38: $i] :
              ( ( X28 @ X38 )
              & ( X42
                = ( X22 @ X38 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X50: $i,X51: $i,X52: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X51 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X51 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X50 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X50 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ X52 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X52 ) )
        | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X50 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X50 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X51 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X51 ) )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X50 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X50 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ X52 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X52 ) )
        | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X50 )
        | ( esk2_0
         != ( esk1_0 @ X50 ) ) )
      & ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) )
      & ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) )
      & ( ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
        | ( esk2_0
          = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 )
      | ( esk2_0
       != ( esk1_0 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X3 )
      | ( esk2_0
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        = esk2_0 )
      | ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 )
      | ( esk2_0
       != ( esk1_0 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X3 )
      | ( esk2_0
       != ( esk1_0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
      = esk2_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        = esk2_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
      = esk2_0 )
    | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 )
     != esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
      = esk2_0 )
    | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
      = esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
        = esk2_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    = esk2_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk5_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 )
     != esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_28]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 )
   != esk2_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_28]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
      = esk2_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
        = esk2_0 )
      | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_32]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
      = esk2_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_32]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk2_0
      = ( esk1_0 @ esk5_0 ) )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
        = esk2_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_34]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred1_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
    = esk2_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_34]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).

thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( epred1_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( epred2_0 @ esk3_0 )
      | ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred1_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_40]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0 @ esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_40]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( esk1_0 @ X1 )
       != esk2_0 )
      | ~ ( epred2_0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_42]),c_0_24])]) ).

thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_42]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET752^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:46:50 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YnvV2NU9la/E---3.1_1261846.p
% 0.23/0.27  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.23/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.23/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting sh1l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % post_as_ho1 with pid 1261883 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Result found by post_as_ho1
% 0.23/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.23/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.27  % Search class: HGHSF-FFSM33-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.27  % partial match(3): HGHNF-FFSM00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1261889 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.27  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN.
% 0.23/0.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting new_ho_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.27  % Search class: HGHSF-FFSM33-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.27  % partial match(3): HGHNF-FFSM00-SHSSMFNN
% 0.23/0.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.27  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.27  
% 0.23/0.27  % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.27  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.27  % Parsed axioms                        : 45
% 0.23/0.27  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Initial clauses                      : 35
% 0.23/0.27  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 22
% 0.23/0.27  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.23/0.27  % Processed clauses                    : 48
% 0.23/0.27  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.23/0.27  % ...remaining for further processing  : 42
% 0.23/0.27  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Backward-subsumed                    : 22
% 0.23/0.27  % Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 0.23/0.27  % Generated clauses                    : 63
% 0.23/0.27  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 57
% 0.23/0.27  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 10
% 0.23/0.27  % Paramodulations                      : 61
% 0.23/0.27  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Total rewrite steps                  : 29
% 0.23/0.27  % ...of those cached                   : 26
% 0.23/0.27  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.27  % Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.23/0.27  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.23/0.27  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.27  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/0.27  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.23/0.27  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.27  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Current number of archived clauses   : 35
% 0.23/0.27  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 64
% 0.23/0.27  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 0.23/0.27  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 33
% 0.23/0.27  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.23/0.27  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.23/0.27  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.23/0.27  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.27  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2867
% 0.23/0.27  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 379
% 0.23/0.27  
% 0.23/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.27  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.27  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.27  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.23/0.27  
% 0.23/0.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.27  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.27  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.27  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.23/0.27  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.27  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------