↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET764+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:36:55 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 72.69s 10.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 72.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  29   ~;  26   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   5 sgn  46   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subset) ).

fof(equal_set,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( equal_set(A,B)
    <=> ( subset(B,A)
        & subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equal_set) ).

fof(empty_set,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ member(X,empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',empty_set) ).

fof(inverse_image2,axiom,
    ! [F,B,X] :
      ( member(X,inverse_image2(F,B))
    <=> ? [Y] :
          ( apply(F,X,Y)
          & member(Y,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',inverse_image2) ).

fof(thIIa14,conjecture,
    ! [F,A,B] :
      ( maps(F,A,B)
     => equal_set(inverse_image2(F,empty_set),empty_set) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thIIa14) ).

fof(thIIa14_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [F,A,B] :
        ( maps(F,A,B)
       => equal_set(inverse_image2(F,empty_set),empty_set) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIIa14]) ).

fof(nnf_29,plain,
    ? [F,A,B] :
      ( ~ equal_set(inverse_image2(F,empty_set),empty_set)
      & maps(F,A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thIIa14_neg]) ).

fof(sk_thIIa14_neg,plain,
    ( ~ equal_set(inverse_image2(sK0,empty_set),empty_set)
    & maps(sK0,sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(F,sK0),skolemize(A,sK3),skolemize(B,sK4)],[nnf_29]) ).

cnf(c_302,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(inverse_image2(sK0,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_thIIa14_neg]) ).

fof(nnf_24,plain,
    ! [F,B,X] :
      ( ( ! [Y] :
            ( ~ apply(F,X,Y)
            | ~ member(Y,B) )
        | member(X,inverse_image2(F,B)) )
      & ( ? [X0] :
            ( apply(F,X,X0)
            & member(X0,B) )
        | ~ member(X,inverse_image2(F,B)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inverse_image2]) ).

fof(sk_inverse_image2_sk,plain,
    ! [F,B,X] :
      ( ( ! [Y] :
            ( ~ apply(F,X,Y)
            | ~ member(Y,B) )
        | member(X,inverse_image2(F,B)) )
      & ( ( apply(F,X,sK1(F,B,X))
          & member(sK1(F,B,X),B) )
        | ~ member(X,inverse_image2(F,B)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK1(F,B,X))],[nnf_24]) ).

fof(sk_inverse_image2,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( ~ apply(VAR_1,VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ member(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | member(VAR_0,inverse_image2(VAR_1,VAR_2)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( apply(VAR_1,VAR_0,sK1(VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_0))
        | ~ member(VAR_0,inverse_image2(VAR_1,VAR_2)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(sK1(VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_0),VAR_2)
        | ~ member(VAR_0,inverse_image2(VAR_1,VAR_2)) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_inverse_image2_sk]) ).

cnf(c_312,plain,
    ( member(sK1(B,C,A),C)
    | ~ member(A,inverse_image2(B,C)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_inverse_image2]) ).

cnf(c_340,plain,
    ~ member(A,empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[empty_set]) ).

cnf(c_349,plain,
    ( ~ subset(B,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B)
    | equal_set(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equal_set]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [X] :
            ( ~ member(X,B)
            & member(X,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset]) ).

fof(sk_subset_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK2(A,B),B)
          & member(sK2(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,B)
            | ~ member(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X,sK2(A,B))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subset,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subset_sk]) ).

cnf(c_353,plain,
    ( member(sK2(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subset]) ).

cnf(c_1453,plain,
    subset(empty_set,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_340]) ).

cnf(c_1470,plain,
    ( member(sK1(A,B,sK2(inverse_image2(A,B),C)),B)
    | subset(inverse_image2(A,B),C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_312]) ).

cnf(c_1783,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,empty_set)
    | equal_set(A,empty_set) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1453,c_349]) ).

cnf(c_7063,plain,
    subset(inverse_image2(A,empty_set),B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1470,c_340]) ).

cnf(c_7160,plain,
    equal_set(inverse_image2(A,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7063,c_1783]) ).

cnf(c_7161,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7160,c_302]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET764+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:18:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 395996 was started by sandbox on n016,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:18:01 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 72.69/10.62  
% 72.69/10.62  % given #500 (I,wt=27): 619 -member(A,B) | apply(C,A,A) | -member(D,E) | -apply(F,A,D) | -apply(V6,D,A) | member(f11(C,V6,F,B,E,B),B).  [factor(356,a,b)].
% 72.69/10.62  
% 72.69/10.62  % given #1000 (I,wt=26): 1119 -member(A,B) | -member(C,B) | -apply(D,A,A) | -apply(D,A,C) | apply(E,A,C) | member(f29(D,B,D,B,E),B).  [factor(696,d,e),merge(b)].
% 72.69/10.62  
% 72.69/10.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 72.69/10.62  
% 72.69/10.62  % Proof 1 at 1.82 (+ 0.30) seconds.
% 72.69/10.62  % Length of proof is 16.
% 72.69/10.62  % Level of proof is 5.
% 72.69/10.62  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 72.69/10.62  % Given clauses 1496.
% 72.69/10.62  
% 72.69/10.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------