↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SET766+4 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 03:32:38 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  11   ~;   8   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thIII02,plain,
    ! [E,R,A] :
      ( ( equivalence(R,E)
        & member(A,E) )
     => member(A,equivalence_class(A,E,R)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thIII02) ).

fof(thIII02_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [E,R,A] :
        ( ( equivalence(R,E)
          & member(A,E) )
       => member(A,equivalence_class(A,E,R)) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[thIII02]) ).

cnf(73,plain,
    equivalence(sK24,sK23),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[thIII02_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    equivalence(sK24,sK23),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[73]) ).

fof(equivalence,plain,
    ! [A,R] :
      ( equivalence(R,A)
    <=> ( ! [X] :
            ( member(X,A)
           => apply(R,X,X) )
        & ! [X,Y] :
            ( ( member(X,A)
              & member(Y,A) )
           => ( apply(R,X,Y)
             => apply(R,Y,X) ) )
        & ! [X,Y,Z] :
            ( ( member(X,A)
              & member(Y,A)
              & member(Z,A) )
           => ( ( apply(R,X,Y)
                & apply(R,Y,Z) )
             => apply(R,X,Z) ) ) ) ),
    file('Axioms/SET006+2.ax',equivalence) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,X1)
    | ~ equivalence(X2,X1)
    | apply(X2,X0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[equivalence]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK25,sK23)
    | ~ equivalence(sK24,sK23)
    | apply(sK24,sK25,sK25) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

fof(equivalence_class,plain,
    ! [R,E,A,X] :
      ( member(X,equivalence_class(A,E,R))
    <=> ( member(X,E)
        & apply(R,A,X) ) ),
    file('Axioms/SET006+2.ax',equivalence_class) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,X1)
    | ~ apply(X2,X3,X0)
    | member(X0,equivalence_class(X3,X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[equivalence_class]) ).

cnf(l29,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK25,sK23)
    | ~ apply(sK24,sK25,sK25)
    | member(sK25,equivalence_class(sK25,sK23,sK24)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    member(sK25,sK23),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[thIII02_negated]) ).

cnf(l2,plain,
    member(sK25,sK23),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

cnf(l31,plain,
    member(sK25,sK23),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    ~ member(sK25,equivalence_class(sK25,sK23,sK24)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[thIII02_negated]) ).

cnf(l32,plain,
    ~ member(sK25,equivalence_class(sK25,sK23,sK24)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l29,l2,l31,l32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.09  % Problem  : SET766+4 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.09  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime : Mon Jul 21 22:36:49 EDT 2025
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.09/0.30  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.14/0.32  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.14/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------